2009
DOI: 10.1080/09298210903180252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling Tonal Attraction Between Adjacent Musical Elements

Abstract: A context-independent model of tonal attraction is presented based on the formal musical property of interval cycles. An interval cycle is the minimum number of additive iterations of an interval that are required for the original pitch classes to be re-stated. Interval cycles are conjectured to give rise to an abstract grouping property, interval cycle proximity, which in turn is responsible for tonal attraction. The model was tested using a probe tone experiment requiring subjects to rate the probe for stren… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between these different instructions is illustrated as follows: In the static attraction experiment a C major context primes the C major key such that C (the tonic) as a probe tone receives maximal attraction, followed by the members of the tonic triad G (the dominant) and E (the mediant). By contrast, in the dynamic attraction experiment a C major context primes the F major key because the chord CEG is the dominant triad of F major which is resolved by its tonic triad FAC, making the probe tone F most likely, followed by C and then A (Woolhouse 2009). Yet another possibility could be melodic progression where C primes its minor and major second intervals below and above, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference between these different instructions is illustrated as follows: In the static attraction experiment a C major context primes the C major key such that C (the tonic) as a probe tone receives maximal attraction, followed by the members of the tonic triad G (the dominant) and E (the mediant). By contrast, in the dynamic attraction experiment a C major context primes the F major key because the chord CEG is the dominant triad of F major which is resolved by its tonic triad FAC, making the probe tone F most likely, followed by C and then A (Woolhouse 2009). Yet another possibility could be melodic progression where C primes its minor and major second intervals below and above, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Depending on the instruction, one can distinguish between probe tone experiments on static or dynamic attraction (Parncutt 2011). In the static attraction paradigm subjects are asked to rate how well the probe tone fits into the preceding context (Krumhansl and Kessler 1982), while in the dynamic attraction paradigm subjects are asked to rate how well the probe tone completes or resolves the preceding context (Temperley 2008, Woolhouse 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For more detailed descriptions and supporting empirical research, see Woolhouse (2007) and Woolhouse (2009).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] In this article I attempt to tackle the thorny issue of major-minor tonality in the seventeenth century by recourse to a grouping model, referred to as interval cycle proximity (Woolhouse, 2007;Woolhouse, 2009;Woolhouse and Cross, 2010). The topic of the emergence of major-minor tonality is as broad as it is controversial.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%