2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rdf.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling time-varying volatility in the Indian stock returns: Some empirical evidence

Abstract: This paper models time-varying volatility in one of the Indian main stock markets, namely, the National Stock Exchange (NSE) located in Mumbai, investigating whether it has been affected by the recent global financial crisis. A Chow test indicates the presence of a structural break. Both symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models suggest that the volatility of NSE returns is persistent and asymmetric and has increased as a result of the crisis. The model under the Generalized Error Distribution appears to be the mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other, marginal differences, emerge with respect to the distributional assumptions: GED and normal distributions now perform better than the t -distribution. Note that consistently with previous findings from Tripathy and Jil-Alana (2015), GED is always selected as the most appropriate distribution for India.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other, marginal differences, emerge with respect to the distributional assumptions: GED and normal distributions now perform better than the t -distribution. Note that consistently with previous findings from Tripathy and Jil-Alana (2015), GED is always selected as the most appropriate distribution for India.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…They also provide evidence that the use of non-normal error distributions improves the forecasting performance of the models. Along similar lines, Tripathy and Gil-Alana (2015) look at forecasting models for the Indian National Stock Exchange and conclude that models with generalized error distribution (GED) provide superior fit, but their out-of-sample forecast performance is unsatisfactory. Sharma and Vipul (2015) further show that identification of the best performing model within a group of competing models is sensitive to the choice of the loss criterion used to compare performance.…”
Section: The Analysis Of Return Volatility: Methods and Previous Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The results show that shocks to the Ghana equity market are usually transient with minimal instances of persistence and confirm that EGARCH (1,1) is superior in modelling the volatility of returns on the equity market for the study period. In modelling time varying volatility in the context of Indian stock markets using the symmetric and asymmetric GARCH models, Tripathy and Gil-Alana (2015) indicate that the volatility of stock returns is persistent and asymmetric. The study reveals that the model under generalised error distribution appears to be the most suitable one.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comprehensive review of the applications of these models is documented in the literature [e.g., Poon and Granger (2003) and Tripathy and Gil-Alana (2010)]. Overall, despite new developments in volatility modeling, the usefulness of ARCH-type models are notable as they continue to dominate stock market studies until recently [e.g., Guo and Neely (2008), Lee et al (2001), Sanyal et al (2016), Sharma and Vipul (2016), Srinivasan (2011), Tripathy and Gil-Alana (2015), and Zhou and Zhou (2005)]. In this paper, we apply a combination of three models, which are designated for examining information asymmetry: threshold GARCH (TARCH), exponential GARCH (EGARCH), and component GARCH (CGARCH).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%