2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2206.12497
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling time delays from two reprocessors in active galactic nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although, details models which take into account both disk geometry and BLR contribution are required(see e.g. Jaiswal, Prince, Panda, & Czerny, 2022), further observations could also help to disentangle between these two different phenomena. For example, by performing multi-epoch detailed X-ray spectral-timing analysis at different stages of the campaign could help to constrain the inner geometry of the accretion flow (Mastroserio, Ingram, & van der Klis, 2020) and therefore quantify the real contribution of the BLR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although, details models which take into account both disk geometry and BLR contribution are required(see e.g. Jaiswal, Prince, Panda, & Czerny, 2022), further observations could also help to disentangle between these two different phenomena. For example, by performing multi-epoch detailed X-ray spectral-timing analysis at different stages of the campaign could help to constrain the inner geometry of the accretion flow (Mastroserio, Ingram, & van der Klis, 2020) and therefore quantify the real contribution of the BLR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dynamically evolving corona, as the one observed with pure X-ray spectral timing methods (e.g., Alston et al 2020), could play a significant role in at least driving the changing of the contribution from the diffuse continuum from the BLR to the overall multi-wavelength variability (Vincentelli et al 2021(Vincentelli et al , 2022. Although details models which take into account both disk geometry and BLR contribution are required(see e.g., Jaiswal et al 2022), further observations could also help to disentangle between these two different phenomena. For example, performing multi-epoch detailed X-ray spectral-timing analysis at different stages of the campaign could help to constrain the inner geometry of the accretion flow (Mastroserio et al 2020) and therefore quantify the real contribution of the BLR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to distinguish between the effect of the position of the irradiating source and the contamination by the scattering medium (see Fig. 5) is discussed in Jaiswal et al (2022). However, in some sources, the effect may also be related to an incorrect estimate of the black hole mass (Pozo Nuñez et al 2014.…”
Section: Cosmology With Quasarsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in the current paper, we simply assume the response function in the form of a symmetric Gaussian shape, with the time shift set by Equation 1, and the width σ BLR of 10% of the same delay. Exceptionally, we also performed tests using a half-Gaussian shape for this purpose, as done in the simulations of the time delay by Jaiswal et al (2022).…”
Section: Delayed Dense Lightcurvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, for the comparison, we performed simulations with the response function in the form of half-Gaussian (see e.g. Jaiswal et al 2022) but assuming the shift as implied by the formulae, and the width as in a standard model, i.e. 10 % of the time delay.…”
Section: Prediction Sensitivity On the Adopted Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%