2011
DOI: 10.1080/01431160903464146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the vegetation–climate relationship in a boreal mixedwood forest of Alberta using normalized difference and enhanced vegetation indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since this NDVI data set is used as input to or for benchmarking global carbon, water and energy cycle models, it is important that we understand how much variability in vegetation growth is captured by this NDVI data set and if the causes of variability are linked to climate (precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation), disturbance (fires and large area outbreaks of pests), human management (e.g., irrigation and fertilization), or residual errors. Other studies have been published that reveal correlations between climate and NDVI [26][27][28][29][30], but none have combined analyses on monthly anomalies, lead time dynamics, cumulative climate effects and non-climate signal interference at global scales [31,32], and none have used global NDVI time series longer than 20 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this NDVI data set is used as input to or for benchmarking global carbon, water and energy cycle models, it is important that we understand how much variability in vegetation growth is captured by this NDVI data set and if the causes of variability are linked to climate (precipitation, temperature, and solar radiation), disturbance (fires and large area outbreaks of pests), human management (e.g., irrigation and fertilization), or residual errors. Other studies have been published that reveal correlations between climate and NDVI [26][27][28][29][30], but none have combined analyses on monthly anomalies, lead time dynamics, cumulative climate effects and non-climate signal interference at global scales [31,32], and none have used global NDVI time series longer than 20 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The global vegetation index products (NDVI and EVI) at 1‐km spatial resolution for the period 2001–2010 were obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's MODIS and further integrated into 12.5‐km (0.125°) spatial resolution grid cells. The indices are computed from MODIS daily surface reflectance that are radiometrically calibrated, cloud‐filtered, atmospherically corrected (corrected for molecular scattering, ozone absorption, and aerosols), spatially and temporally gridded, and adjusted for view angle influences (Huete et al, ; Jahan & Gan, ).…”
Section: Study Area and Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EVI is an optimized index combining blue, red, and near‐infrared bands from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensor to minimize atmospheric and canopy background effects on NDVI and allows for higher accuracy of vegetation monitoring and better reflection of vegetation conditions (Huete et al, ). The NDVI and EVI are the most commonly used vegetation indices and have been widely applied for land cover classification (Zhang, Sun, Zhang, & Tong, ), plant diversity forecast (John et al, ), vegetation dynamic monitoring (Zhu & Li, ), determination of land use patterns (Vanacker, Linderman, Lupo, Flasse, & Lambin, ), exploration of relationships between vegetation and hydroclimatic factors (Deng, Su, & Liu, ; Jahan & Gan, ; Méndez‐Barroso, Vivoni, Watts, & Rodríguez, ), and many other purposes. However, these two satellite‐based indices have rarely been compared, thus far, in studies on the response of vegetation to climate change, and their performances in predicting vegetation dynamics under changing environment have seldom been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Niemeyer and Vogt, 2001). Time series of satellite images have an important role in the monitoring of regional and global ecosystem properties such as carbon storage and primary productivity (Potter et al, 2008;Potapov et al, 2009;Ise et al, 2010;Jahan and Gan, 2011); soil moisture (Temimi et al, 2010); and the influence of human disturbance regimes (Jin and Sader, 2005;Westermann et al, 2011), such as fire (Lozano et al, 2008;Huesca et al, 2009;Dubinin et al, 2010), or land use change (Hu et al, 2009;Ge, 2010;Sulla-Menashe et al, 2011). Satellite sensors are well-suited to monitoring tasks because they provide repeatable measurements at a spatial scale which is appropriate for capturing the effects of changes in key properties of ecosystem functioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%