2010
DOI: 10.1108/17465661011061005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the success factors for national R&D organizations: a case of India

Abstract: PurposeNational policy makers in India have realized that the research and development (R&D) performance of India has not been up to the benchmark. This paper aims to identify and develop the structural cause and effect relationship among various factors that affect the performance of national R&D organizations in India.Design/methodology/approachA questionnaire‐based survey, interpretive structural modelling and structural equation modelling, has been applied in this paper. In this paper, ten factors have bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ISM has been used successfully in various fields: energy management (Saxena et al , 1992), information technology (Kanungo, 2009), manufacturing strategy (Singh et al , 2007), organizational behaviour (Jyoti et al , 2010), performance management (Manoharan et al , 2010), project management (Iyer and Sagheer, 2010), risk management (Jha and Devaya, 2008), supply chain management (Ravi and Shankar, 2005), strategic management (Bolanos et al , 2005), total quality management (Sahney et al , 2006), vendor selection (Mandal and Deshmukh, 1994) and waste management (Sharma et al , 1995) to identify the relationships among the elements.…”
Section: Literature Review In Lementioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISM has been used successfully in various fields: energy management (Saxena et al , 1992), information technology (Kanungo, 2009), manufacturing strategy (Singh et al , 2007), organizational behaviour (Jyoti et al , 2010), performance management (Manoharan et al , 2010), project management (Iyer and Sagheer, 2010), risk management (Jha and Devaya, 2008), supply chain management (Ravi and Shankar, 2005), strategic management (Bolanos et al , 2005), total quality management (Sahney et al , 2006), vendor selection (Mandal and Deshmukh, 1994) and waste management (Sharma et al , 1995) to identify the relationships among the elements.…”
Section: Literature Review In Lementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robust R&D operations are undertaken if protection is provided, which leads to the start of profitable businesses. Failure to protect software firms' developed products might affect a company's ability to operate freely at the primary level in the global market (Clarkson & Dekorte, 2006), which in turn would threaten a firm's own existence (Dedrick & Kraemer, 1993;Jyoti et al, 2010). Software innovations are usually incremental, fast-changing, and have a short lifecycle.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The software market was born in the US and it still acts as a trendsetter for software patenting by opening its doors to software and business method patents (Cameron et al, 2006). Other countries are following the US to protect the interest of their researchers, as the failure to protect might affect a company's ability to operate freely at the basic level in the global market (Clarkson & Dekorte, 2006), which in turn would threaten their own existence (Dedrick & Kraemer, 1993;Jyoti et al, 2010). The best way to survive is to study and learn from the patenting strategies followed by the market leaders who are successfully protecting their inventions via means of patenting.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%