2007
DOI: 10.5194/hess-11-1543-2007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the spatial variability of snow water equivalent at the catchment scale

Abstract: Abstract. The spatial distribution of snow water equivalent (SWE) is modelled as a two parameter gamma distribution. The parameters of the distribution are dynamical in that they are functions of the number of accumulation and melting events and the temporal correlation of accumulation and melting events. The estimated spatial variability is compared to snow course observations from the alpine catchments Norefjell and Aursunden in Southern Norway. A fixed snow course at Norefjell was measured 26 times during t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
60
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to specify the spatial variability of snow depth over mountainous, treeless topography for large-scale grid cells, we first need to define the pdf of snow depths in a domain size L. Commonly applied snow depth distributions at the peak of winter range from lognormal for complete snow cover (Donald et al, 1995;Pomeroy et al, 1998;DeBeer and Pomeroy, 2009) to gamma (Skaugen, 2007;Egli et al, 2012) to normal in forests (Marchand and Killingtveit, 2005). Second, we need to scale the defining parameters mean and standard deviation of the snow depth distribution, HS and σ HS , respectively, with the underlying subgrid terrain characteristics.…”
Section: Parameterizing Spatial Variability Of Snow Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to specify the spatial variability of snow depth over mountainous, treeless topography for large-scale grid cells, we first need to define the pdf of snow depths in a domain size L. Commonly applied snow depth distributions at the peak of winter range from lognormal for complete snow cover (Donald et al, 1995;Pomeroy et al, 1998;DeBeer and Pomeroy, 2009) to gamma (Skaugen, 2007;Egli et al, 2012) to normal in forests (Marchand and Killingtveit, 2005). Second, we need to scale the defining parameters mean and standard deviation of the snow depth distribution, HS and σ HS , respectively, with the underlying subgrid terrain characteristics.…”
Section: Parameterizing Spatial Variability Of Snow Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A main objective of snow-hydrological modeling is to estimate the total amount of snow water equivalent (SWE) and to predict the snow melt water run-off originating from the snow. There exists a large range of snow model types, from physical deterministic spatial distributed models [e.g., Lehning et al, 2006;Liston and Elder, 2006] and lumped snowmelt models including the concept of the areal depletion curve [Luce et al, 1999] to pure statistical models using sums of correlated gamma distributed variables [Skaugen, 2007].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With estimated values of E(z 0 ) and var(z 0 ), the fraction of wet area, p, can be determined from equation (10). In support of an assumption of a one-to-one relationship between E(z 0 ) and var(z 0 ), we have found reports in the literature on very high correlation between spatial mean and spatial standard deviation (Creutin & Obled, 1982;Barancourt et al, 1992;Skaugen, 2007), which we can use to determine the right-hand side of equation (11). In assessing this relationship, we have to consider events, over a fixed area, for which zeros are observed, but where spatial mean and variance are estimated from non-zero observations.…”
Section: Estimating the Intermittency Of A Precipitation Fieldmentioning
confidence: 81%