2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00040-005-0862-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the role of intracolonial genetic diversity on regulation of brood temperature in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies

Abstract: In polyandrous social insects such as honey bees, a worker's affi nity for a particular task may be genetically infl uenced and so some patrilines may have lower stimulus thresholds for commencing a task than others. We used simulation models to investigate the effects of intracolonial diversity in the task thresholds that stimulate workers to engage in heating and cooling during nest thermoregulation. First, we simulated colonies comprised of one or 15 patrilines that were engaged in heating the brood nest, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both studies assumed a pre-determined distribution of thresholds within and between patrilines. By allowing the threshold values to evolve by selection, our study extends the results of Myerscough and Oldroyd (2004) and Graham et al (2006) and demonstrates that an increased number of matings may indeed provide long-term benefits even when the threshold values can evolve adaptively. Consistent with these models, empirical data suggest that higher mating frequency has positive effects on colony fitness (Fuchs and Schade 1994;Mattila and Seeley 2007;Oldroyd et al 1991) and control of brood nest temperature in the honeybee (Jones et al 2004(Jones et al , 2007.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, both studies assumed a pre-determined distribution of thresholds within and between patrilines. By allowing the threshold values to evolve by selection, our study extends the results of Myerscough and Oldroyd (2004) and Graham et al (2006) and demonstrates that an increased number of matings may indeed provide long-term benefits even when the threshold values can evolve adaptively. Consistent with these models, empirical data suggest that higher mating frequency has positive effects on colony fitness (Fuchs and Schade 1994;Mattila and Seeley 2007;Oldroyd et al 1991) and control of brood nest temperature in the honeybee (Jones et al 2004(Jones et al , 2007.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…As a result, colonies headed by multiply mated queens were more efficient in conducting both the foraging and regulatory tasks. Two theoretical studies had previously investigated how multiple matings by queens influence the ability of workers to regulate nest temperature (Graham et al 2006;Myerscough and Oldroyd 2004). These studies concluded that, by increasing withincolony genetic variability, polyandry is an important contributor to the ability of colonies to precisely thermoregulate the nest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting difference in the responses of workers to a given stimulus intensity leads to individuals with a lower threshold for a given task being more likely to perform that task than individuals with a higher threshold. A variety of models have been proposed to account for the emergence of intracolony division of labor on the basis of variation in response thresholds (Robinson 1987(Robinson , 1992Bonabeau et al 1996;Page and Mitchell 1998;Théraulaz et al 1998;Graham et al 2006;Jeanson et al 2007; also see Beshers and Fewell 2001;Smith et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PTM, the relation between stimulus and threshold is interpreted as the probability of performing the task. While these responsethreshold models are frequently used to explain division of labor in colonies of social insects (Bertram et al 2003;Graham et al 2006;Jeanson et al 2007), no attempts have been made to quantify their efficiency in task allocation. Here, we show with analysis and quantitative simulations that using the DTM (Page and Mitchell 1998) and the PTM (Bonabeau et al 1996) leads to suboptimal colony performance under some stimulus conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%