2019
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of ichthyoplankton in the Yangtze Estuary, China

Abstract: Aim: Species distribution models (SDMs) are an effective tool to explore the potential distribution of terrestrial, freshwater and marine organisms; however, SDMs have been seldom used to model ichthyoplankton distributions, and thus, our understanding of how larval stages of fishes will respond to climate change is still limited. Here, we developed SDMs to explore potential impacts of climate change on habitat suitability of ichthyoplankton. Location: Yangtze Estuary, China.Methods: Using long-term ichthyopla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
13
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
3
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, such modeling lacks quantification of a species’ ability to disperse, ignores potential for evolutionary change, and fails to account for biotic impacts, assuming that climate is the greatest driving factor of a species distribution (Jackson & Sax, 2010; Saupe et al., 2012; Soberón et al., 2007). Despite these limitations, such modeling efforts are beneficial in order to determine the validity of various predictions in the future (Esser et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Finally, in order to computationally assess a species’ niche with fidelity, many of the aforementioned factors could be used together.…”
Section: Climate Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Yet, such modeling lacks quantification of a species’ ability to disperse, ignores potential for evolutionary change, and fails to account for biotic impacts, assuming that climate is the greatest driving factor of a species distribution (Jackson & Sax, 2010; Saupe et al., 2012; Soberón et al., 2007). Despite these limitations, such modeling efforts are beneficial in order to determine the validity of various predictions in the future (Esser et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019). Finally, in order to computationally assess a species’ niche with fidelity, many of the aforementioned factors could be used together.…”
Section: Climate Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite these limitations, such modeling efforts are beneficial in order to determine the validity of various predictions in the future (Esser et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019). Finally, in order to computationally assess a species' niche with fidelity, many of the aforementioned factors could be used together.…”
Section: Climate Model Limitati On Smentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We projected each of the models under the current and future climate scenarios using 70% of the training data and 30% for evaluation [ 43 ]. The most effective SDMs require data on both species presence and available environmental conditions (pseudo-absence data); thus, for each species, the number of pseudo-absences was randomly sampled and equaled ten times the number of presences [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%