2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(02)00520-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the influence of weed competition on the growth of young Pinus radiata at a dryland site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
38
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore broom can be properly managed by cutting out broom stems that overhang the tree saplings' main shoot. However, caution is required as broom can be a strong competitor outside the geographic range of beech (Bossard, 1991;Smith and Harlen, 1991;Watt et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Conclusion: Implications For Forest Vegetation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore broom can be properly managed by cutting out broom stems that overhang the tree saplings' main shoot. However, caution is required as broom can be a strong competitor outside the geographic range of beech (Bossard, 1991;Smith and Harlen, 1991;Watt et al, 2003a).…”
Section: Conclusion: Implications For Forest Vegetation Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the dryland site, the difference in growth rate was attributable to more pronounced seasonal root-zone water deficit where the weeds were present (Watt et al 2003a(Watt et al , 2003b. The effects of removal of competitive weeds during the establishment phase in young conifer plantations in enhancing tree growth are well documented (Baker 1973;Knowe et al 1985;Nelson et al 1985;Richardson et al 1996;Mason and Whyte 1997;Zhao 1999;Watt et al 2003a), with growth gains ranging from 25-fold 1 year after planting to almost two-fold after 10 years (Richardson 1993). These growth gains have been primarily attributed to increased availability of water, light and nutrients (Nambiar and Sands 1993;Richardson 1993), and there is strong evidence to suggest that growth gains in the juvenile phase are maintained throughout the length of the rotation (Snowdon and Khanna 1989;Balneaves and McCord 1990;Mason and Milne 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Such an approach requires information on the effects of silvicultural treatment on growth rate and wood quality in the early growth stages. Large differences in tree height and diameter growth in 3-year-old Pinus radiata D. Don trees growing where the tall competitive understorey weed broom (Cytisus scoparius L.) was present or removed (Watt et al 2003a) provided an opportunity to investigate differences in wood cell properties associated with the treatment differences. At the dryland site, the difference in growth rate was attributable to more pronounced seasonal root-zone water deficit where the weeds were present (Watt et al 2003a(Watt et al , 2003b.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies carried out on both moist (Richardson et al 1996;Richardson et al 1999) and dry sites (Clinton et al 1995;Richardson et al 1997;Richardson and Whitehead 2002;Watt et al, 2003) have shown that broom can have a large negative influence on radiata pine growth during the establishment phase. These effects persist in stands that are slow to close canopy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%