2021
DOI: 10.12816/0060057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Impact of Corporate Risk Management on Firms Financial Performance and Sustainable Growth: Evidence Grounded on Emerging and Developed Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, H 3a is accepted, while H 3b and H 3c are rejected because ADI and ADP have an insignificant impact on EPS. These results are inconsistent with Bagh et al (2016) who found that ADR has a significant positive association with EPS, while ADI has a significant negative association with EPS.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingscontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, H 3a is accepted, while H 3b and H 3c are rejected because ADI and ADP have an insignificant impact on EPS. These results are inconsistent with Bagh et al (2016) who found that ADR has a significant positive association with EPS, while ADI has a significant negative association with EPS.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Findingscontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, the main hypotheses (H1, H2 and H3) are accepted. These results agree with the findings of previous literature such as, Dadzie (2017), Bagh et al (2016) and Yazdanfar & Öhman (2014) who found that the number of days of CCC is associated negatively with FP measured by ROA. While these results contradicted with Nijam et al (2016) who found that, there is a significant positive association between CCC and FP measured by ROA and ROE.…”
Section: Regression Analysissupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations