1995
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3115(95)00116-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the high burnup UO2 structure in LWR fuel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
59
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lassmann et al (1994) from the Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany, wrote the TUBRNP code, which improves upon RADAR by modifying the parameters for the plutoniumdistribution function and accounting for the plutonium isotopes explicitly. The result is a somewhat more edge-peaked distribution function at nominal to high fuel burnups, which is supported by comparison to detailed neutronics calculations and to detailed electron microprobe data on the distribution of both plutonium and stable fission products (Lassmann et al 1994;Lassmann et al 1995). Lassmann's model has demonstrated good comparisons to detailed data on burnup distribution while retaining more generality than the specific-case interpolations by Matsamura or Shann; it is therefore chosen for application in FRAPCON-3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Lassmann et al (1994) from the Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany, wrote the TUBRNP code, which improves upon RADAR by modifying the parameters for the plutoniumdistribution function and accounting for the plutonium isotopes explicitly. The result is a somewhat more edge-peaked distribution function at nominal to high fuel burnups, which is supported by comparison to detailed neutronics calculations and to detailed electron microprobe data on the distribution of both plutonium and stable fission products (Lassmann et al 1994;Lassmann et al 1995). Lassmann's model has demonstrated good comparisons to detailed data on burnup distribution while retaining more generality than the specific-case interpolations by Matsamura or Shann; it is therefore chosen for application in FRAPCON-3.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…For power reactors burn-up is expressed as the cumulative heat output from a nuclear fuel, i.e., in megawatt days per kilogram heavy metal (U + Pu). The rare-earth fission product neodymium can be used as an indicator of the local burn-up because it is immobile in the fuel [21]. (The neodymium nuclide remains in the lattice site where it comes to rest following fission.)…”
Section: Determination Of the Local Burn-up In Irradiated Nuclear Fuelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28]). EPMA has revealed that when re-crystallisation occurs nearly all the fission gas is swept out of the fuel matrix [21]. Consequently, the radial extent of re-crystallisation, and the burn-up and temperature thresholds for the process can be established from the distance over which xenon depletion occurs (figure 7) [29].…”
Section: Re-crystallisation Of Nuclear Fuel At High Burn-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E x p er i m ent a l d at a p r e sent ed i n t h e l i t erat u re The onset of the gra i n subdi vi sion pro cess i s observed at a burn-up appro xi m atel y fro m 60 MW d / kgU to 75 MW d/ kg U [2].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has b een conÙrm ed by num erous m easurem ents p erform ed by el ectro n pro be m i croanalysi s (EPMA) tha t xenon depl eti on of the m atri x occurs, due to atherm al rel ease o f xenon fro m the UO 2 gra i ns [1,2,4]. The experi m enta l resul ts i ndi cate tha t nearl y a ll xeno n tha t has b een swept out of the ori gi nal gra ins i s conta i ned i n the newl y form ed Ùssi o n gas p ores [2,5,6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%