1995
DOI: 10.1016/0376-7388(94)00207-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the effects of particle polydispersity in crossflow filtration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
16
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned previously, the value of f c (d p )N w /f o (d p )N b can be considered as the deposition probability of particles with a diameter of d p . The curves show an interesting trend which is quite different from those in previous studies [7][8][9]. A critical diameter for particle deposition was observed [7][8][9], and the particles which size exceeds the critical value cannot stably deposit onto the membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As mentioned previously, the value of f c (d p )N w /f o (d p )N b can be considered as the deposition probability of particles with a diameter of d p . The curves show an interesting trend which is quite different from those in previous studies [7][8][9]. A critical diameter for particle deposition was observed [7][8][9], and the particles which size exceeds the critical value cannot stably deposit onto the membrane surface.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…For a particulate sample with a wide-size distribution, its filterability is far different from a uniform-size one even having the same mean particle size [7][8][9]. In addition, a few Nomenclature C 1 correction factor of drag force due to suspension flow C 2 correction factor of drag force due to permeate flow C 3 constant defined in Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 3300 kPa, this parameter grows continuously reaching higher values and no decay is observed. As reported in previous studies (Foley et al, 1995;Salgado et al, 2013), a reduction in the resistance due to the cake formation can be caused by an increase of the osmotic pressure. For this purpose it has to be considered that the overall pressure drop (applied transmembrane pressure Δp) at any time is the sum of pressure drops through the membrane, Δp m , and cake, Δp c , plus the osmotic pressure, Δπ.…”
Section: Resistance To the Permeate Fluxsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…On the other hand, particles possessing a size exceeding the cut-off diameter will remain suspended. In crossflow microfiltration, Foley et al (1995) successfully described the influence of particle polydispersity using a cut-off diameter concept.…”
Section: Cut-off Diametermentioning
confidence: 99%