1999
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1998.0235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the effects of constraint upon speech-based human–computer interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Error correction methods employed in dictation systems [21], for instance, is very different from repair in dialogue systems [10]. Such techniques usually involve error recognition via the visual modality and repair through speech interaction ("respeaking") [1] or, more recently, through combinations of modalities [21,8,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Error correction methods employed in dictation systems [21], for instance, is very different from repair in dialogue systems [10]. Such techniques usually involve error recognition via the visual modality and repair through speech interaction ("respeaking") [1] or, more recently, through combinations of modalities [21,8,11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…His work models the impact of error correction and degradation of recognition accuracy on transaction time. We have used unit-task-network models (speci"cally MicroSaint) to investigate error correction and the e!ects of constraint on speech-based interaction with computers (Baber & Hone, 1993;Hone & Baber, 1999). Examination of the issues surrounding the combination of unit-times for prediction of human performance raises questions concerning the scheduling of unit-tasks and the coordination of activity.…”
Section: Predicting Transaction Timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of error correction has been extensively studied in the area of spoken language dialogue systems where recognition rates and user acceptance of an imperfect input modality can be improved through clever interaction design and exploitation of domain constraints [2]. In applications such as dictation systems, for which domain-specific constraints will not readily come to the rescue of system designers, userspecific factors can sometimes be brought to bear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%