2021
DOI: 10.1007/s40808-021-01161-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the effect of geo-matrix conduction on the bulk and pore water resistivity in hydrogeological sedimentary beddings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation in this investigation was conducted using Equation ( 4) and yielded a range of values from 4.9 × 10-6 to 3.2 × 10-5 m/s. The hydraulic conductivity range mentioned aligns with the values reported by Shamsuddin et al (2018), George et al (2021), andGeorge (2021) for aquifers composed of fine to gravelly sand. The parameter has a weight of 3 and its values were assigned ratings ranging from 1 to 6, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Recharge Value = Sf + Rf + Spf (3)supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The estimation in this investigation was conducted using Equation ( 4) and yielded a range of values from 4.9 × 10-6 to 3.2 × 10-5 m/s. The hydraulic conductivity range mentioned aligns with the values reported by Shamsuddin et al (2018), George et al (2021), andGeorge (2021) for aquifers composed of fine to gravelly sand. The parameter has a weight of 3 and its values were assigned ratings ranging from 1 to 6, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Recharge Value = Sf + Rf + Spf (3)supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The dominant wind pattern in the region during the dry season is the Harmattan winds originating from the north, while the monsoon winds from the Atlantic Ocean prevail during the rainy season (Vrbka et al, 1999). The research area experiences a variation in annual temperatures, ranging from 20 °C during the wet or rainy season to around 35 °C during the dry season George et al, 2017George et al, , 2021.…”
Section: Description Of the Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Manual smoothening was adopted to eradicate spurious signals that would have resulted in high root mean square errors (RMSE) in the computer phase of the data interpretation (Evans et al, 2015;George et al, 2020;Ekanem et al, 2022a, b). This was performed by calculating the mean of the two values of ρ a at point of cross-over point and discarding any outliers anywhere it was indispensable in such a manner as to maintain the prevailing resistivity variation pattern in the data (Ekanem, 2021;George et al, 2020George et al, , 2022a).…”
Section: Geo-sounding Measurements and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic process of estimating hydraulic resistance can begin by combination of geo-electric data, measured water resistivity and specific formation constants to estimate the formation-pore hydrodynamic properties, which include effective porosity ( ) and permeability (k f ) that are essential parameters in estimating hydraulic conductivity, K (Al- Ismaily et al 2012;George et al 2021). From Archie (1942), bulk resistivity , water resistivity w , geometric factor/electrical tortuosity factor a, and cementation factor m are related by Eq.…”
Section: Theoretical Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%