2005
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mci067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Effect of Fruit Growth on Surface Conductance to Water Vapour Diffusion

Abstract: By predicting crack occurrence during fruit growth, this model could be helpful in managing cropping practices for integrated plant protection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the aim to score separately the resistance of skin and flesh, uninjured and artificially injured fruit inoculations were carried out, hereon SK and FL, respectively. SK treatment was performed by applying 10 μl of spore suspension to the surface of the center of the sun-exposed fruit cheek, where fruit cracks are lower than in pedicel and stylar regions (Gibert et al 2005). FL treatment was accomplished by creating an artificial wound in the center of the fruit, 2 mm deep, with a 1-mmthick sterile needle and immediately inoculating in the same way as SK.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the aim to score separately the resistance of skin and flesh, uninjured and artificially injured fruit inoculations were carried out, hereon SK and FL, respectively. SK treatment was performed by applying 10 μl of spore suspension to the surface of the center of the sun-exposed fruit cheek, where fruit cracks are lower than in pedicel and stylar regions (Gibert et al 2005). FL treatment was accomplished by creating an artificial wound in the center of the fruit, 2 mm deep, with a 1-mmthick sterile needle and immediately inoculating in the same way as SK.…”
Section: Plant Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SK assays were designed in order to represent infection of BR on fruit skin occurring in uniform conditions of humidity, temperature, fruit ripening stage, and inoculum quantity and strain. The observed variation across years of phenotyping can be due to environmental factors influencing fruit barrier efficiency (Gibert et al 2005;Gibert et al 2009;Measham et al 2009). Since C-if infections are the result of the presence of natural inoculum on the studied fruits, in this treatment, environmental variability is also influencing fungal pathogenicity (Tian and Bertolini 1999), and thus, low seasonal correlations should be expected.…”
Section: Response To Br Infection In Peachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments were performed in 2003 on trees grafted on GF 677 rootstock planted in 1999 and cultivated outdoors in 110-L containers. The trees were goblet-trained and received routine horticultural care (Gibert et al 2005). Full bloom occurred on March 24.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in agreement with those obtained by Gibert et al (2009) who found a relationship between the fruit size and its susceptibility to brown rot infection. In the case of high growth rates, it is likely that the pulp expansion rate exceeds the cuticle expansion rate (Gibert et al, 2005) and results in cuticular cracking which makes fruits more susceptible to the brown rot infection. A similar pattern seems to hold for different fruit tree species (Fourie and Holz, 2003) as pre-harvest cuticle cracks, FIGURE 4 | Rain (mm) and average daily temperature T ( • C) along Julian day left column.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%