1992
DOI: 10.1016/0960-1686(92)90108-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the dry deposition velocity of aerosol particles to a spruce forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
84
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements at the Weidenbrunnen site by Held et al (2002) revealed consistent patterns in the size distributions of particulate NH + 4 and NO − 3 , with the former one dominating the fine particle concentrations (mean particle diameter of 0.25 and 0.71 µm), and the latter dominating the coarse particles ranges (mean particle diameter of 0.71 and 2 µm). For particles with mean diameters of 0.25, 0.71 and 2 µm, v d at the encountered wind speeds would theoretically range between 0.01-0.6, 0.01-1.08, and 0.06-3.5 cm s −1 , respectively (Peters and Eiden, 1992). According to Gallagher et al (1997) 4 and those derived from particle number flux measurements have been reported (Nemitz et al, 2004b;Thomas, 2007).…”
Section: Fluxes and Deposition Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Measurements at the Weidenbrunnen site by Held et al (2002) revealed consistent patterns in the size distributions of particulate NH + 4 and NO − 3 , with the former one dominating the fine particle concentrations (mean particle diameter of 0.25 and 0.71 µm), and the latter dominating the coarse particles ranges (mean particle diameter of 0.71 and 2 µm). For particles with mean diameters of 0.25, 0.71 and 2 µm, v d at the encountered wind speeds would theoretically range between 0.01-0.6, 0.01-1.08, and 0.06-3.5 cm s −1 , respectively (Peters and Eiden, 1992). According to Gallagher et al (1997) 4 and those derived from particle number flux measurements have been reported (Nemitz et al, 2004b;Thomas, 2007).…”
Section: Fluxes and Deposition Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.2) we presume that they also dominate the deposition fluxes, at least in tot-NO − 3 . Aerosol particle fluxes and v d 's depend on particle diameter, atmospheric conditions (friction velocity and stability) and surface conditions, such as roughness and canopy morphology (Erisman et al, 1997;Gallagher et al, 1997;Peters and Eiden, 1992;Fowler et al, 2009). Reported v d 's range from some mm s −1 (small particles (<1 µm); low wind speed) to more than 10 cm s −1 (larger particles (>10 µm); high wind speed).…”
Section: Fluxes and Deposition Velocitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.12.003 reported to have much shorter residence time in the atmosphere, typically ranging from several days to a few weeks (Lindqvist and Rodhe, 1985;Slemr et al, 1985), thus it is likely to be deposited at intermediate distances from the source. Deposition rate of particulate mercury depend on the particle diameter, especially for dry deposition of particulate mercury (Lestari et al, 2003;Peters and Eiden, 1992;Davidson et al, 1985). Although the importance of fractionation measurements of airborne mercury is well recognized, only a very limited number of investigations have been conducted in China.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dry deposition of trace gases is calculated using dry deposition velocity, which is parameterized by an aerodynamic sub-layer and surface resistance. Dry deposition of aerosols is calculated using gravitational sedimentation velocity (Wesely, 1989), resistance due to interception (Ruijgrok et al, 1995;Zhang et al, 2001), impaction (Peters and Eiden, 1992), and Brownian motion (Binkowski and Shankar, 1995). Wet deposition of both aerosols and trace gases in-cloud and below-cloud are also treated in the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%