2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.11.211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the cyclic behaviour in a DTB crystallizer—a two-population balance model approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This oscillating process behavior is a typical characteristic of an MSMPR crystallizer in which some form of activated nucleation is dominant. 65 The needlelike crystals were not observed for at least 12 residence times in the STC operated at a residence time of 2 h (STC-C06) (see Figures S45 and S46), unlike the case at a higher precipitant concentration (STC-C03). Furthermore, only the tetragonal form was obtained from the experiment performed in the STC at a residence time of 1 h (STC-C05) for at least 24 residence times of operation (see Figures S43 and S44).…”
Section: Influence Of Residence Timementioning
confidence: 97%
“…This oscillating process behavior is a typical characteristic of an MSMPR crystallizer in which some form of activated nucleation is dominant. 65 The needlelike crystals were not observed for at least 12 residence times in the STC operated at a residence time of 2 h (STC-C06) (see Figures S45 and S46), unlike the case at a higher precipitant concentration (STC-C03). Furthermore, only the tetragonal form was obtained from the experiment performed in the STC at a residence time of 1 h (STC-C05) for at least 24 residence times of operation (see Figures S43 and S44).…”
Section: Influence Of Residence Timementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For modelling the evolution of a population of crystals during crystallisation processes, onedimensional (1D) population balance (PB) approach (e.g., (Alvarez and Myerson, 2010, Caillet et al, 2007, Garside, 1985, Gerstlauer et al, 2006, Hounslow et al, 2005, Li et al, 2013, Liu and Li, 2014, Menon et al, 2005, Patience et al, 2004, Rawlings et al, 1992, Temmel et al, 2016, Ulbert and Lakatos, 2005, Ward et al, 2006), using a characteristic size, such as length (e.g., (Vetter et al, 2014, Ward et al, 2011), diameter or radius of a volume equivalent sphere (e.g., ) to simplify a faceted crystal, was used and still being used widely. Two-dimensional (2D) PB method was developed to account for needle-/rod-/plate-like crystals (e.g., (Briesen, 2009, Gunawan et al, 2004, Ma et al, 2007, Oullion et al, 2007, Puel et al, 2003a, Puel et al, 2003b, Sato et al, 2008, Shi et al, 2006), whilst the introducing a volumetric shape factor into the 1D (or 2D) PB is to more accurately represent the crystal volume .…”
Section: S1 Mini-review Of Pb Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a population of crystals (dissolving or crystallizing) in a crystallizer to manufacture pharmaceutical materials, the evolution of these crystals in terms of both size and shape is not well investigated using PB techniques. Traditionally, PB methods treat faceted crystals as their volume equivalent spheres with volume equivalent diameters (e.g., refs , ), regardless of their actual shapes (cubic-like, plate-like, or needle-like...). Therefore, the shape information, hence face-specified properties, is lost by the simplification .…”
Section: Application Of Morphological Population Balance For Crystall...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Population balance (PB) modeling (for example, refs ) has proved to be an excellent simulation tool for predicting the evolution of crystal size distributions for many practical processes. However, crystalline materials in their processing environment are inherently rarely spherical in terms of their external particle morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%