2015
DOI: 10.12720/jtle.2.4.263-270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the Crossing Behavior of Pedestrian at Uncontrolled Intersection in Case of Mixed Traffic Using Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System

Abstract:  Abstract-Critical gap is the most important parameter associated with gap acceptance study especially in case of delay and capacity estimation. Many studies are reported on gap acceptance behavior of pedestrian but most of them confined to developed country where traffic is homogeneous and traffic rules are strictly followed. Uncontrolled intersections in case of developed countries control the traffic and pedestrian movements based on priorities but in India, no one follows the stop and yield signs, even th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, fuzzy approaches have shown their utility in dealing with qualitative reasoning on them. For instance, on modelling the crossing behavior of pedestrians from their critical gap [49] or of cyclists from their social force [50]. Nevertheless, and as with many mathematical models, these approaches have focused on specific decisions that depend on functions and thresholds over certain inputs.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, fuzzy approaches have shown their utility in dealing with qualitative reasoning on them. For instance, on modelling the crossing behavior of pedestrians from their critical gap [49] or of cyclists from their social force [50]. Nevertheless, and as with many mathematical models, these approaches have focused on specific decisions that depend on functions and thresholds over certain inputs.…”
Section: Qualitative Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%