2006
DOI: 10.1243/09544097jrrt31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the cost of railway asset renewal projects using pairwise comparisons

Abstract: This research article presents the development process of a cost-estimating model for railway renewal projects at the early stage of a project life cycle. The model comprises four main stages: creating a project structure that composes the goal, project criteria, and alternatives; collecting the necessary data in the form of pairwise comparisons made by a domain expert; producing alternative weights using a geometric mean; finally, employing an algorithmic method using the produced alternative weights and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modelling the cost of railway asset renewal projects using pairwise comparisons [342] UK Design X X Presented the development process of a cost-estimating model for railway renewal projects at the early stage of a project life cycle. The practical implications of the developed model are its ability to estimate renewal project costs of railway assets when there is a lack of quantitative data and detailed project definition.…”
Section: Pairwise Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modelling the cost of railway asset renewal projects using pairwise comparisons [342] UK Design X X Presented the development process of a cost-estimating model for railway renewal projects at the early stage of a project life cycle. The practical implications of the developed model are its ability to estimate renewal project costs of railway assets when there is a lack of quantitative data and detailed project definition.…”
Section: Pairwise Comparisonsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, the network for a North American class 1 railroad is used as an example to discuss how to determine α, γ, and the flow cost in the ISM. For a multiyear capacity planning project, the increase in flow cost over time and the discount factor to compute the net present value are considered; therefore, c ij in this general formulation is a set of discounted flow costs by year within the planning horizon (Acharya et al 1991;Lee 2002;Ling et al 2006). Fig.…”
Section: Ism For a Class 1 Railroadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare delay cost and capital investment in the same duration base (year), the authors further defined an attribute, annual net investment, as the total construction cost of the alternative (Table 2) divided by the infrastructure life (∼20 years). It is based on the life-cycle cost analysis method commonly used for multiyear capacity planning projects (10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Finally, the alternatives were ranked on the basis of the benefit as defined by annual delay cost divided by the annual net investment cost.…”
Section: Impact Analysis Modulementioning
confidence: 99%