2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2003.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling the compression behaviour of landfilled domestic waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Powrie and Beaven, 1999;Hudson et al, 1999Hudson et al, , 2001Hudson et al, , 2004Stoltz et al, 2010;Olivier & Gourc, 2007). As well as variation due to different methods of compaction, waste in a landfill can be substantially compressed by the weight of overlying layers, which may reach several tens of metres deep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powrie and Beaven, 1999;Hudson et al, 1999Hudson et al, , 2001Hudson et al, , 2004Stoltz et al, 2010;Olivier & Gourc, 2007). As well as variation due to different methods of compaction, waste in a landfill can be substantially compressed by the weight of overlying layers, which may reach several tens of metres deep.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike soil solids, which are generally considered incompressible, many of the solid components comprising MSW are compressible and may therefore undergo an increase in density and specific gravity as load is applied (Hudson et al 2004. Specific gravity is defined as the ratio of unit weight of solids Sowers (1973) proposed that, to mitigate excessive landfill settlements, it might be desirable to control environmental factors to retard decomposition (known as dry tomb landfilling), thereby reducing decomposition related settlement.…”
Section: Waste Compressibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Hudson et al (2004) measured the effects of pore water pressure and gas accumulation upon the change in composite density and drainable porosity of field obtained waste samples in a large-scale testing device.…”
Section: Waste Compressibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most products are compacted before being put into landfills [60] [61] Total Cost Savings = Total Weight of Products * Tipping Fee (Equation (2)) Using the average tipping fee of $43.99/ton, and the total calculated weight of 13,913 tons, the total tipping fee cost savings was $612,023.…”
Section: Quantifying the Environmental Benefits Of Donated Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%