Abstract:Background/Aims: Past caries experience has been shown to be the best predictor of the development of caries in the future, and clinical observations suggest that caries develops symmetrically in similar teeth on each side of the mouth. This study investigates whether caries on a given surface can be used as a predictor of future caries on the corresponding surface on the other side of the mouth. Methods: The data come from a 3-year trial examining the caries-preventive efficacy of chlorhexidine varnish on ado… Show more
“…In this study, the comparison between DMFT index and the simplified DMF2Q index failed to identify differences between mean values found, suggesting the possibility of simplifying the index, regardless of gender and age of the study population as a reliable alternative based on symmetrical distribution of dental caries attack, similarly to other studies [6,11,12,14,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Dating back to the 50's, recurrent studies in scientific literature point to dental caries bilateralism, symmetrically affecting corresponding teeth in different quadrants, and this knowledge has promising application in public health [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], in case studies confirm the validity of partial exams to reveal the full manifestation of dental caries in the population.…”
Objective: To verify the validity of two simplified DMFT indexes compared to the full DMFT. Material and Methods: This is an exploratory observational validation study with sample defined by convenience of 88 adult and older adult volunteers treated in a university dental clinic. After calibration, two examiners performed inspection tests with application of the DMFT index. The average total DMFT was compared with crossed quadrants (DMF2Q) and DMF of the right and left sides by age and sex using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The mean age of participants was 42.2 years and median of 44 years, and of these, 53 (60.2%) were female. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the means of DMFT and DMF2Q indexes between sexes (males 16.1 vs 16.1; p = 0.87 and females 16.4 vs 16.6; p = 0.24) or between the right and left sides (males 8.1 vs. 8.1 p = 0.50 and females 8.3 vs 8.1; p = 0.99). In addition, no differences were observed between DMFT and DMF2Q in the age groups of adults (30-44 years 17.8 vs 17.4; p = 0.564) and older adults (60 and over 23.4 vs 24.0; p = 0.298). The comparison between DMF OF right and left sides also showed no difference between adults (8.8 vs 9.1; p = 0.134) and older adults (11.8 vs 11.7; p = 0.951). Conclusion: Data obtained were consistent with similar studies on the distribution of dental caries in quadrants, allowing simplifying the DMFT index for epidemiological estimates.
“…In this study, the comparison between DMFT index and the simplified DMF2Q index failed to identify differences between mean values found, suggesting the possibility of simplifying the index, regardless of gender and age of the study population as a reliable alternative based on symmetrical distribution of dental caries attack, similarly to other studies [6,11,12,14,16,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Dating back to the 50's, recurrent studies in scientific literature point to dental caries bilateralism, symmetrically affecting corresponding teeth in different quadrants, and this knowledge has promising application in public health [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], in case studies confirm the validity of partial exams to reveal the full manifestation of dental caries in the population.…”
Objective: To verify the validity of two simplified DMFT indexes compared to the full DMFT. Material and Methods: This is an exploratory observational validation study with sample defined by convenience of 88 adult and older adult volunteers treated in a university dental clinic. After calibration, two examiners performed inspection tests with application of the DMFT index. The average total DMFT was compared with crossed quadrants (DMF2Q) and DMF of the right and left sides by age and sex using the Wilcoxon test. Results: The mean age of participants was 42.2 years and median of 44 years, and of these, 53 (60.2%) were female. The analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the means of DMFT and DMF2Q indexes between sexes (males 16.1 vs 16.1; p = 0.87 and females 16.4 vs 16.6; p = 0.24) or between the right and left sides (males 8.1 vs. 8.1 p = 0.50 and females 8.3 vs 8.1; p = 0.99). In addition, no differences were observed between DMFT and DMF2Q in the age groups of adults (30-44 years 17.8 vs 17.4; p = 0.564) and older adults (60 and over 23.4 vs 24.0; p = 0.298). The comparison between DMF OF right and left sides also showed no difference between adults (8.8 vs 9.1; p = 0.134) and older adults (11.8 vs 11.7; p = 0.951). Conclusion: Data obtained were consistent with similar studies on the distribution of dental caries in quadrants, allowing simplifying the DMFT index for epidemiological estimates.
“…A random intercepts formulation was utilised, following the practice of other recent hierarchical analyses of caries and other dental data [Gilthorpe et al, 2000a;Bower et al, 2007;Burnside et al, 2007Burnside et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Hierarchical Data Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred transformation in the analysis of caries data by this method has been the logit link, utilised in the analyses of Rodrigues and Sheiham [2000], Vanobbergen et al [2001], Riley et al [2004] and Burnside et al [2007Burnside et al [ , 2008. Vanobbergen et al [2001] state that logistic regression models using longitudinal data are the preferred method of analysis for caries data.…”
Recently methods of caries quantification in the primary dentition have moved away from summary ‘whole mouth’ measures at the individual level to methods based on generalised linear modelling (GLM) approaches or survival analysis approaches. However, GLM approaches based on logistic transformation fail to take into account the time-dependent process of tooth/surface survival to caries. There may also be practical difficulties associated with casting parametric survival-based approaches in a complex multilevel hierarchy and the selection of an optimal survival distribution, while non-parametric survival methods are not generally suitable for the assessment of supplementary information recorded on study participants. In the current investigation, a hybrid semi-parametric approach comprising elements of survival-based and GLM methodologies suitable for modelling of caries occurrence within fixed time periods is assessed, using an illustrative multilevel data set of caries occurrence in primary molars from a cohort study, with clustering of data assumed to occur at surface and tooth levels. Inferences of parameter significance were found to be consistent with previous parametric survival-based analyses of the same data set, with gender, socio-economic status, fluoridation status, tooth location, surface type and fluoridation status-surface type interaction significantly associated with caries occurrence. The appropriateness of the hierarchical structure facilitated by the hybrid approach was also confirmed. Hence the hybrid approach is proposed as a more appropriate alternative to primary caries modelling than non-parametric survival methods or other GLM-based models, and as a practical alternative to more rigorous survival-based methods unlikely to be fully accessible to most researchers.
“…둘째, 치아우식증은 좌우대칭 으로 발생하는 경향이 있다. 구강을 상하좌우 사분악으로 구분하 여 치아 또는 치면간 우식경험도의 상관성을 분석한 결과, 좌우관 계가 상하관계보다 상관성이 높았고, 같은 치면에서 좌우대칭으 로 발생하였다 7,[13][14][15][16][17] . 셋째, 인구집단에서 치아우식증의 분포는 정 규분포를 하지 않고 편향되어 나타난다 18) .…”
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the pattern of dental caries in a high-risk group of Korean adolescents. Methods: Raw data on 10,542 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 15 years from the 2012 Korean National Oral Health Survey was used. The subjects were divided into a high caries risk group and non-high caries risk group for analysis. For the statistical analyses, we utilized a frequency analysis, descriptive statistics, and a multidimensional scaling analysis. Results: The pattern of dental caries in the high caries risk group were divided into six classifications for 12-year-olds and five for 15-year-olds, including the mandibular first molar occlusal surface (Cluster 1). In the high caries risk group, the frequency of Cluster 1 was approximately 4-times higher in 12-yearolds than that in the non-high caries risk group of Cluster 1, and about 3-times higher in 15-year-olds. The multidimensional scaling analysis found that in the high caries risk group, the same types of tooth surfaces formed separate groups. The prevalent dental caries pattern of 12-year-olds in the high caries risk group was left-right symmetry, while in the 15-year-olds of the high caries risk group, the caries pattern also included the antagonistic teeth, along with left-right symmetry. However, the non-high caries risk group had a pattern of left-right symmetry only in the 15-year-olds. Conclusions: When dental caries occur in the first molar, there is a high possibility of being classified into the high caries risk group. Therefore, preventative measures should focus on the antagonistic teeth and the teeth on the opposite side.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.