2019
DOI: 10.1002/joom.1009
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling supply chain adaptation for disruptions: An empirically grounded complex adaptive systems approach

Abstract: Through the development and usage of an agent‐based model, this article investigates firms' adaptive strategies against disruptions in a supply chain network. Viewing supply chain networks as complex adaptive systems, we first construct and analyze a real‐world supply chain network among 2,971 firms spanning 90 industry sectors. We then develop an agent‐based simulation to show how the model of firms' adaptive behaviors can leverage competition relationships within a supply chain network. The simulation also m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
114
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demirel et al (2019) point to stability as a 'basic desirable property of a supply network without an explicit consideration of performance' while the robustness and resilience explicitly include the performance in the analysis of disruption impacts. Ivanov and Sokolov (2013) show that robustness allows to analyse the system ability to withstand a disruption (or a series of disruptions) without any structural and parametrical changes/adaptations, while resilience analysis explicitly allows the system to employ some recovery/adaptation in order to restore the disrupted operations and performance (Craighead et al 2007;Zhao, Zuo, and Blackhurst 2019).…”
Section: Viability Vs Stability Robustness and Resilience Of Scsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Demirel et al (2019) point to stability as a 'basic desirable property of a supply network without an explicit consideration of performance' while the robustness and resilience explicitly include the performance in the analysis of disruption impacts. Ivanov and Sokolov (2013) show that robustness allows to analyse the system ability to withstand a disruption (or a series of disruptions) without any structural and parametrical changes/adaptations, while resilience analysis explicitly allows the system to employ some recovery/adaptation in order to restore the disrupted operations and performance (Craighead et al 2007;Zhao, Zuo, and Blackhurst 2019).…”
Section: Viability Vs Stability Robustness and Resilience Of Scsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…complex supply networks with dynamically changing structures, roles and behaviours of the firms involved. For example, Zhao, Zuo, and Blackhurst (2019) show that a competitor of a focal firm can also serve as the focal firm's upstream supplier echoed by Niu et al (2019) who consider a co-opetition SC setting on the example of Apple and Samsung with a competitive supplier (i.e. frenemy) that plays the role of both supplier and competing focal firm in two different but intersecting SCs simultaneously causing dependence asymmetry (Dong et al 2015).…”
Section: Intertwined Supply Network (Isn)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ivanov (2020) shows that differently than the traditional, linearly directed SCs with static structures, the firms in value webs may exhibit multiple behaviors by changing the buyer-supplier roles in interconnected or even competing SCs and causing dependence asymmetry (Dong et al 2015). For example, a competitor of a focal firm can also serve as the focal firm's upstream supplier playing the role of both supplier and competing focal firm in two different but intersecting SCs simultaneously as discussed in Zhao et al (2019). Fracassia et al (2017) point to the multiple, intersecting SCs in the industrial symbiosis that are characterized by using the waste of some SC processes as the inputs into the other SCs.…”
Section: Value Websmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a direct consequence of the globalization and the interconnection of SCN nodes, they became less resilient to unexpected disruptions, and a failure in one SCN entity can potentially cascade across the whole network. Several authors have investigated this phenomenon in order to determine what factors make SCNs resilient and to propose mitigation strategies (see, e.g., [99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%