2014
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2013-0484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling resilient modulus seasonal variation of silty sand subgrade soils with matric suction control

Abstract: Resilient modulus of unbound materials is an important parameter in the mechanistic design of pavements. Although unbound layers are frequently in a partially saturated state, a total stress approach is conventionally used in modelling the material behaviour and therefore pore pressure effects are not considered. In fine-grained unbound materials, the saturation state can affect their mechanical behaviour due to pore pressure effects. In this study a modified test procedure and a predictive resilient modulus m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The M RSAT of a decomposed tuff from Hong Kong (soil 11 in Table 1) and four subgrade soils from Minnesota (soils 7-10 in Table 1) are reported to be constant values regardless of the applied stress levels (Sawangsuriya et al 2009;Ng et al 2013). Similar observations on the M RSAT were also reported by Loach (1987) and Salour et al (2014) for several subgrade soils from Europe. The M R values of a clayey soil and a lean clay from Oklahoma (soils 2 and 3 in Table 1) are approximately the same at saturated condition regardless of the different compaction moisture contents and the resulting different soil fabric or structure (Zaman and Khoury 2007).…”
Section: Model Formulationsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The M RSAT of a decomposed tuff from Hong Kong (soil 11 in Table 1) and four subgrade soils from Minnesota (soils 7-10 in Table 1) are reported to be constant values regardless of the applied stress levels (Sawangsuriya et al 2009;Ng et al 2013). Similar observations on the M RSAT were also reported by Loach (1987) and Salour et al (2014) for several subgrade soils from Europe. The M R values of a clayey soil and a lean clay from Oklahoma (soils 2 and 3 in Table 1) are approximately the same at saturated condition regardless of the different compaction moisture contents and the resulting different soil fabric or structure (Zaman and Khoury 2007).…”
Section: Model Formulationsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Extensive experimental investigations were conducted by several researchers during the past decade using advanced testing techniques to measure the M R -relationships and propose models for predictions (Khoury and Zaman 2004;Yang et al 2005Yang et al , 2008Liang et al 2008;Sawangsuriya et al 2009;Craciun and Lo 2010;Cary and Zapata 2011;Nowamooz et al 2011;Azam et al 2013;Ng et al 2013;Sahin et al 2013;Sivakumar et al 2013;Salour et al 2014). These studies have provided valuable information for better understanding the influence of the on the M R .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analyses carried out here were based on the total stress concept. For the relatively coarse nature of the materials used for this study, the amount of matric suction developed at the drier states was considered negligible and was not treated as a separate variable (Fredlund and Rahardjo 1993, Theyse 2006, Ekblad 2007, Craciun 2009, Erlingsson et al 2009, Cary and Zapata 2011, Salour et al 2014. Similarly, close to saturation, development of positive pore water pressure was disregarded since the tests were carried out in free drainage conditions on coarse UGMs.…”
Section: Objectives and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The M RSAT that is required in Equation 9 for the estimation of the M R is less sensitive to different stress levels (Sawangsuriya et al 2009, Ng et al 2013, Salour et al 2014. For this reason, a constant M RSAT value can be used for a specific soil for different stress levels, which are typically in the range of 10 to 100 kPa.…”
Section: Figure 4 Measured and Estimated M Ropt Of The Two Soils Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This philosophy has been more widely extended during the last decade by several investigators to interpret the M R of the compacted pavement subgrade soils (Khoury and Zaman 2004, Yang et al 2008, Liang et al 2008, Cary and Zapata 2011, Azam et al 2013, Salour et al 2014. Several semi-empirical models are proposed in the literature to predict the M R for various soils incorporating ψ as one of the influencing factors (Yang et al 2005, Cary and Zapata 2011, Ng et al 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%