2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling regulating ecosystem services trade-offs across landscape scenarios in Třeboňsko Wetlands Biosphere Reserve, Czech Republic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the investigation the relationship between ecosystem management and the provision of the total bundle of ES has become a major field in ES studies ( e.g ., ). The synergies and trade‐offs between ES provided to different users under current and alternative scenarios have significant implications for decision‐making.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges Of Ecosystem Services Operationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In recent years, the investigation the relationship between ecosystem management and the provision of the total bundle of ES has become a major field in ES studies ( e.g ., ). The synergies and trade‐offs between ES provided to different users under current and alternative scenarios have significant implications for decision‐making.…”
Section: Opportunities and Challenges Of Ecosystem Services Operationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The potential service supply was modelled based on a constructed land cover map derived from potential vegetation types. Harmackova and Vackar (2015) assessed the outcomes of regulating ecosystem service trade-offs from alternative scenarios in a Czech Wetlands Biosphere Reserve. They found out that regulating ecosystem service values were highest under a nature conservation scenario whereas an exploitation scenario would lead to net carbon losses.…”
Section: C: Case Study Applications For Ecosystem-based Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, many ESV models can dynamically assess the spatial heterogeneity of ESV but fail to distinguish the effects of climate change and land-use change on ESV (Harmáčková and Vačkář 2015), such as the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) which is a suite of software models used to map and value the goods and services from nature that sustain and fulfill human life. First, the proxy method is usually adopted to assess the ESV, which generates great uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%