2021
DOI: 10.1111/ddi.13414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling presence versus abundance for invasive species risk assessment

Abstract: Aim Invasive species prevention and management can be guided by comparisons of invasion risk across space and among species. Species distribution models are widely used to assess invasion risk and typically estimate suitability for species presence. However, suitability for presence may not capture patterns of abundance and impact. We asked how models estimating suitability for presence versus suitability for abundance aligned in their implications for risk assessment. Location Western United States. Methods W… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
20
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we included local scale biotic predictors representing plant-plant interactions in our models to assess their impact on model performance. Given the potential discrepancy between SDM and SAM outputs (e.g., Jarnevich et al, 2021), we explore the performance differences of both model types and validation approaches. These comparisons are relevant, for example, in selecting the best approach for upscaling model results for conservation purposes.…”
Section: Does Including Biotic Predictors Improve Sam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we included local scale biotic predictors representing plant-plant interactions in our models to assess their impact on model performance. Given the potential discrepancy between SDM and SAM outputs (e.g., Jarnevich et al, 2021), we explore the performance differences of both model types and validation approaches. These comparisons are relevant, for example, in selecting the best approach for upscaling model results for conservation purposes.…”
Section: Does Including Biotic Predictors Improve Sam Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is to construct species abundance models (SAMs) to understand how a species’ abundance varies with environmental factors. Compared to SDMs, SAMs are expected to provide better predictions of trends in species performance under climate change (Morris & Ehrlén, 2015) and these predictions may be mismatched with those from SDMs (e.g., Jarnevich et al, 2021). However, specifically assessing differences in SDM versus SAM predictions has, to our knowledge, not been carried out in the Arctic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Responses to abiotic gradients vary among invasive annual grasses in the Great Basin (Brooks et al, 2016;Bykova & Sage, 2012;McMahon et al, 2021), but changes in a few key climate variables are likely to facilitate range expansions and/ or shifts into higher elevations among several species. In particular, minimum temperature, climatic water deficit (the difference between potential and actual evapotranspiration) and summer precipitation strongly influence the distributions of B. tectorum, B. rubens and (with the exception of summer precipitation) T. caput-medusae (Bradley, 2009;Jarnevich et al, 2021;McMahon et al, 2021). Warming effects on B. tectorum at high elevation are contingent on adequate soil moisture during the growing season (Compagnoni & Adler, 2014a).…”
Section: Climate Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presence–absence data are generally (but not always; Gormley et al, 2011) better than the presence‐only data for modelling species distributions because presence‐only data often suffer from a strong, and difficult to correct, spatial bias in sampling effort (Leroy et al, 2018; Phillips et al, 2009). Furthermore, presence‐only and presence–absence data might misrepresent the spatial distribution of species by exaggerating the importance of small marginal sink populations, contrarily to not only more accurate but also more costly and geographically limited data such as abundance data (Ashcroft et al, 2017; Jarnevich et al, 2021). Thus, the type of data used to measure species occurrence might affect our ability to not only model and predict species distributions but also to understand species–environment relationships (Inman et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%