2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling predation: Theoretical criteria and empirical evaluation of functional form equations for predator-prey systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, not all phenomenological or statistical approaches are guaranteed to be logically consistent (Arditi & Michalski, 1996; Morozov & Petrovskii, 2013). All models should therefore be tested against criteria beyond fit and parsimony before they are applied, for example in population models (Malard et al ., 2020; Moisset de Espanés et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, not all phenomenological or statistical approaches are guaranteed to be logically consistent (Arditi & Michalski, 1996; Morozov & Petrovskii, 2013). All models should therefore be tested against criteria beyond fit and parsimony before they are applied, for example in population models (Malard et al ., 2020; Moisset de Espanés et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activity of consumers depends both in reality and in silico upon the realized rate of grazing and thence the abundance of prey and its quality. Most emphasis in consumer models is directed toward prey capture (e.g., Malard et al, 2020). While RHt2 functions are commonly used as a basis for consumer models (Gentleman et al, 2003), this function is prone to describe implausible encounter, and thence feeding, dynamics (Flynn and Mitra, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here different approaches to describing core facets of consumer models were compared, specifically those used in plankton and fisheries simulations. Feeding in these models is often represented as a rectangular hyperbolic type-2 (RHt2) function of prey abundance (Gentleman et al, 2003;Malard et al, 2020), while empirical studies often make reference to the classic work of Holling (1965) which describes a linear relationship over the initial resource abundance range (hereafter Ht1) before curving over due to limitations at handling (Holling type 2; Ht2). We have previous indicated that care must be taken in deploying RHt2, else it can give rise to impossible rates of prey capture at low prey abundance (Flynn and Mitra, 2016), proposing an alternative satiation controlled encounter based (SCEB) to better conform with expectations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, not all phenomenological or statistical approaches are guaranteed to be logically consistent (Arditi & Michalski, 1996; Morozov & Petrovskii, 2013). All models should therefore be tested against criteria beyond fit and parsimony before they are applied, for example in population models (Malard et al ., 2020; Moisset de Espanés et al ., 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%