2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling plant population size and extinction thresholds from habitat loss and habitat fragmentation: Effects of neighbouring competition and dispersal strategy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
47
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This contradicts the conventional intuition that well-dispersed species should be favoured under such conditions (but see (Liao et al, 2013)). …”
contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…This contradicts the conventional intuition that well-dispersed species should be favoured under such conditions (but see (Liao et al, 2013)). …”
contrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Gaussian kernel). However, our results should be considered as representative for two extreme dispersal modes that delimit the continuum in between, because both types of dispersal have long been used to simplify ecological models, yielding approximately the same results as more realistic dispersal [33,34,[51][52][53][54][55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, compared with the spatial aggregation of disturbance, the spatial aggregation of habitat fragments has completely opposite (i.e. positive) effects on species persistence, because connected habitats provide more opportunities for local recolonization [33,34,49]. Spatial correlation in disturbance led to different competitive outcomes, depending on how much area was disturbed (figures 2 and 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations