Modelling palliative and end-of-life resource requirements during COVID-19: implications for quality care

Abstract

ObjectivesThe WHO estimates that the COVID-19 pandemic has led to more than 1.3 million deaths (1 377 395) globally (as of November 2020). This surge in death necessitates identification of resource needs and relies on modelling resource and understanding anticipated surges in demand. Our aim was to develop a generic computer model that could estimate resources required for end-of-life (EoL) care delivery during the pandemic.SettingA discrete event simulation model was developed and used to estimate resourcing needs for a geographical area in the South West of England. While our analysis focused on the UK setting, the model is flexible to changes in demand and setting.ParticipantsWe used the model to estimate resourcing needs for a population of around 1 million people.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe model predicts the per-day ‘staff’ and ‘stuff’ resourcing required to meet a given level of incoming EoL care activity.ResultsA mean of 11.97 hours of additional community nurse time, up to 33 hours of care assistant time and up to 30 hours additional care from care assistant night sits will be required per day as a result of out of hospital COVID-19 deaths based on the model prediction. Specialist palliative care demand is predicted to increase up to 19 hours per day. An additional 286 anticipatory medicine bundles per month will be necessary to alleviate physical symptoms at the EoL care for patients with COVID-19: an average additional 10.21 bundles of anticipatory medication per day. An average additional 9.35 syringe pumps could be needed to be in use per day.ConclusionsThe analysis for a large region in the South West of England shows the significant additional physical and human resource required to relieve suffering at the EoL as part of a pandemic response.

Patient deaths during the period of prolonged stay in cases of delayed discharge for nonclinical reasons at a university hospital: a cross sectional study

“…Our study period concluded in 2015, coinciding with the end of the economic recession in Spain. During this period, the efficient use of hospital services was of central importance, however, currently, the COVID pandemic requires additional physical and human resources at the end of life as part of the response to the pandemic ( Chalk et al, 2021 ). The COVID pandemic has most likely worsened the situation of patients such as those described in our study.…”

Improving the usability of open health service delivery simulation models using Python and web apps

“…Although our case study model is simple, the methods we describe are applicable across more complex simulations. To illustrate, our online Extended data 31 32 , renal 12 , stroke 33,34 , heart failure 35 , cancer care 36 , end of life care 13 , and operating theatre management 24,37 .…”

“…Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) for simulation offers an alternative to proprietary software without the licensing restrictions that affect uptake, sharing, and reuse of model code 10,11 . In health service delivery research, computational analyses, and simulation studies can be conducted using FOSS tools built in the popular coding languages of Python, R, and Julia [12][13][14][15][16][17] . Use of a language such as Python has further benefits for research as models can now be integrated with the wider data science ecosystem for statistical modelling and machine learning.…”

COVID-19 and cancer in the UK: which will prove to be the lesser of two evils?

“…44 This is not just for diagnostic and treatment services but palliative care services as well which were stretched during the pandemic and needs greater investment. 45 In addition, centralised control of NHS and private sector capacity is necessary to ensure cancer diagnostics and treatments can continue without delays and avoid the inequalities in management that have been observed nationally.…”