2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling outflow following rupture in pipeline networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MOC solves the fluid flow conservation equations by following the Mach-line characteristics inside the pipe. It is claimed that numerical diffusion related to the finite difference approximation of partial derivatives is reduced by this method [33,34], but the MOC needs much longer computation runtimes and cannot predict non-equilibrium or heterogeneous flows [25,35], while the FVM is better at dealing with multi-dimensional flow. In the existing CFD models, the cubic Peng-Robinson (PR) EOS [36] is often used due to its relatively simple mathematical form compared to other more complex (but more accurate) EOS such as AGA-8 [37], BWRS [13] and GERG [20].…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Technique Have Been Develmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOC solves the fluid flow conservation equations by following the Mach-line characteristics inside the pipe. It is claimed that numerical diffusion related to the finite difference approximation of partial derivatives is reduced by this method [33,34], but the MOC needs much longer computation runtimes and cannot predict non-equilibrium or heterogeneous flows [25,35], while the FVM is better at dealing with multi-dimensional flow. In the existing CFD models, the cubic Peng-Robinson (PR) EOS [36] is often used due to its relatively simple mathematical form compared to other more complex (but more accurate) EOS such as AGA-8 [37], BWRS [13] and GERG [20].…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Technique Have Been Develmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have calculated thermodynamic pipeline decompressions from three representative pipeline conditions, specified in Table I using a method similar to that presented in 16 . Figure 7 shows the thermodynamic decompression paths from these three initial conditions in a pressure-temperature p-T diagram.…”
Section: Initial Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature profiles were generated using PipeTech, which takes into account phase-dependent transient heat-transfer effects. 8 As it may be observed, in the case of the gaseous inventory (Figure 7), at any given time interval following puncture, the drop in the temperature due to its expansion-induced cooling is significantly higher than that for the two-phase mixture (Figure 8). At 20 s following puncture, for example, the maximum drop in the gas temperature is about 22 C. This compares with only 2 C for the two-phase mixture.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%