2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of wicking and moisture interactions of flax and viscose fibres

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the surrounding matrix and its constraining effect on flax fibres reduce their accessibility to water but also their swelling[28][29]. The stress state at the fibre/matrix interface is likely to be modified while additional compressive stresses develop on fibres.As observed in figure 1b, the radial swelling strain of flax fibre reaches a maximal value of 21 ± 3% at 98% RH confirming results of Stuart et al[30] and Pucci et al[31].Unlike the radial swelling evolution of flax fibre, over the relative humidity scale (20-98 %), its evolution with moisture content (data taken from[25]) appears quasi-linear (R²= 0.99). Thus, a linear regression enables the radial hygroscopic coefficient βf, R = 1.14 ε/∆m to be estimated for a single flax fibre.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Moreover, the surrounding matrix and its constraining effect on flax fibres reduce their accessibility to water but also their swelling[28][29]. The stress state at the fibre/matrix interface is likely to be modified while additional compressive stresses develop on fibres.As observed in figure 1b, the radial swelling strain of flax fibre reaches a maximal value of 21 ± 3% at 98% RH confirming results of Stuart et al[30] and Pucci et al[31].Unlike the radial swelling evolution of flax fibre, over the relative humidity scale (20-98 %), its evolution with moisture content (data taken from[25]) appears quasi-linear (R²= 0.99). Thus, a linear regression enables the radial hygroscopic coefficient βf, R = 1.14 ε/∆m to be estimated for a single flax fibre.…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Water, diidomethane, ethylene glycol and glycerol contact angle on the fiber surface was determined using the Wilhelmy plate method (Online Resource Figure S2). A Washburn sorption method is suggested to be superior for fibers due to their evident liquid uptake and capillary action (Stuart et al 2015 ). However, measurements with this mode resulted in no apparent sorption taking place and hence the Wilhelmy plate method was used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baiardo et al 55 observed the effects of many chemical treatments on flax fiber/PE composites and found that valerylated flax fiber-reinforced PE composites had greater value of modulus and tensile characteristics as compared to untreated, acetylated, and PEG 350, 750 grafting treated flax fiber-reinforced PE composites, whereas acetylation had adverse effects on modulus and tensile characteristics of flax/PE composites. 56 Vazquez et al 57 conducted a study in which they observed the effects of (i) mercerization treatment, (ii) acrylation treatment, (iii) isocyanate treatment on the tensile characteristic of bagasse fiber/PP composite and observed that all treatments had positive effects on tensile strength of bagasse/PP composites. In addition, isocyanate treatment had highest improvement in tensile strength as compared to remaining surface treatments.…”
Section: Effects Of Surface Treatments On the Tensile Properties Of Nfcsmentioning
confidence: 99%