2010
DOI: 10.4102/sajs.v105i3/4.62
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of W UMa-type variable stars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A shape of the phase diagram is typical of diagrams of contact binary stars. The difference between the primary and secondary minima is around 0.039 mag (usually this difference is no more than 0.1 or 0.2 magnitudes (Skelton and Smits 2009). The difference between maximum and minimum is 0.3558 mag (typically it is of the order of 0.75 mag (Skelton and Smits 2009).…”
Section: Eclipsing Binary Candidate Tyc 2764-1997-1mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A shape of the phase diagram is typical of diagrams of contact binary stars. The difference between the primary and secondary minima is around 0.039 mag (usually this difference is no more than 0.1 or 0.2 magnitudes (Skelton and Smits 2009). The difference between maximum and minimum is 0.3558 mag (typically it is of the order of 0.75 mag (Skelton and Smits 2009).…”
Section: Eclipsing Binary Candidate Tyc 2764-1997-1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As we obtained a larger value for the orbital period than Hoffman et al (2009), there is a possibility that the orbital period of the system has changed since 2009 either due to the redistribution of matter between the stars, or due to the loss of angular momentum. In case of the conservative mass exchange, the period increases if mass is transferred from the less massive to the more massive star (Skelton and Smits 2009). A shape of the phase diagram is typical of diagrams of contact binary stars.…”
Section: Eclipsing Binary Candidate Tyc 2764-1997-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in minima are usually a sign that the temperatures of both stars in the system are different. Light curves of type EW show a continual behavior, similar to EB types, but the minima are deeper than EB, and their absolute difference is small (Skelton, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In the astrophysics parlance, the temperature range considered roughly corresponds to the F spectral class. Contact binaries from these earlier spectral types are thought to form a different subclass of overcontact binaries, called the A-type W UMa stars [72]. A list of ten stars with the values of their parameters and their calculated measures from this restricted sub-population is shown in Table 2.…”
Section: Correlations With Degree Of Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%