2019
DOI: 10.3390/cryst9020069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of the Polymorph Nucleation Based on Classical Nucleation Theory

Abstract: To elucidate the relative nucleation rates of different polymorphs, a competitive kinetic model is developed based on classical nucleation theory to describe the time evolution of two different polymorphic cluster size distributions controlled by the association and dissociation of the solute molecules during polymorph nucleation. Although there is only one type of the solute molecules, the agglomerated solute clusters are divided into two types-A form and B form, which resemble the structures and morphologies… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The σ and ν m are interfacial tension of the solid contact with the solution and molecular volume, respectively; k and T ( 0 K) are the Boltzmann constant and the solution temperature; S is the supersaturation defined with C and C eq as the solute concentration and the solubility of the polymorphs. The supersaturation is known as a critical factor for polymorph selection. , The induction time τ ind is inversely proportional to nucleation rate J because of the relation τ ind ∝ J –1 . Thus, eq can be rewritten as From Figures b and S2, we can extract the values ln τ ind and 1/[ T 3 (ln S ) 2 ] at different Taylor numbers. Thereby, we can estimate the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters in eq of both polymorphs via the linear correlation between ln τ ind and 1/[ T 3 (ln S ) 2 ], as shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The σ and ν m are interfacial tension of the solid contact with the solution and molecular volume, respectively; k and T ( 0 K) are the Boltzmann constant and the solution temperature; S is the supersaturation defined with C and C eq as the solute concentration and the solubility of the polymorphs. The supersaturation is known as a critical factor for polymorph selection. , The induction time τ ind is inversely proportional to nucleation rate J because of the relation τ ind ∝ J –1 . Thus, eq can be rewritten as From Figures b and S2, we can extract the values ln τ ind and 1/[ T 3 (ln S ) 2 ] at different Taylor numbers. Thereby, we can estimate the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters in eq of both polymorphs via the linear correlation between ln τ ind and 1/[ T 3 (ln S ) 2 ], as shown in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supersaturation is known as a critical factor for polymorph selection. 56,57 The induction time τ ind is inversely proportional to nucleation rate J because of the relation τ ind ∝ J −1 . 1−3 Thus, eq 4 can be rewritten as…”
Section: * = *mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polymorphs pairs Eflucimibe [12], d-Mannitol [28] and Famotidine [30], o-Aminobenzoic acid, Stavudine [31], L-Histidine [32], BPT Propyl Ester [33], Florfenicol [34] and L-Glutamic acid [35] each of which show a preference for the stable polymorph at low supersaturations and a preference for the metastable polymorph at higher supersaturations. Shiau used a competitive kinetic model that predicted this behaviour for eflucimibe based on the model derived association and dissociation rate constant for the two polymorphs [36]. More specifically, metastable Form II of o-aminobenzoic acid was the first observed crystalline form when the supersaturation was 2 and above; the stable Form I was the first to crystallise for supersaturations less than 1.5.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to BSM are the 'sticky patch' models that are becoming increasingly popular. Computer simulations (including the Monte Carlo method) are very well suited to studying protein crystal nucleation and polymorphism [16][17][18][19][20][21]. Other different approaches to crystal polymorphism were reported recently [22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%