2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2012.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of surface evolution in abrasive jet micro-machining including particle second strikes: A level set methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond this, second strike effects that resulted from ricocheted particles from the channel side-walls into the center of the channel resulted in an approximately 10% under-prediction of depth. This well-known phenomenon causes an increase in the erosion rate at the channel center that cannot be modelled without advanced particle-tracking methods [66]. Both the maskless and shadow mask techniques resulted in some frosting of the surface adjacent to the channel edges.…”
Section: Effect Of Erosive Efficacy Footprint Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this, second strike effects that resulted from ricocheted particles from the channel side-walls into the center of the channel resulted in an approximately 10% under-prediction of depth. This well-known phenomenon causes an increase in the erosion rate at the channel center that cannot be modelled without advanced particle-tracking methods [66]. Both the maskless and shadow mask techniques resulted in some frosting of the surface adjacent to the channel edges.…”
Section: Effect Of Erosive Efficacy Footprint Widthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figures 2.12,3.8 and 4.10 (x ≥ 0), there was no significant discrepancy between predicted and measured surface evolution of ductile (PMMA) features in terms of profile depth and overall shape well beyond AR of 1, without consideration of second strike effects. The majority of the material in this chapter has been accepted for publication in [51].…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What results is a partial differential equation that can be solved for the time evolving shape of the eroding feature [7,17,25].…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%