2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.03.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of stomatal density response to atmospheric

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
153
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies indicate that angiosperms respond with a higher sensitivity in g s to elevated CO 2 than conifers. Our results suggest that differences in CO 2 response could result from the plant physiological cost of water loss, represented by the Lagrangian multiplier (λ) (Table S2) in the optimization procedure (15). According to the optimization hypothesis, angiosperm species with a low λ can resort to high values of g smax to function under low CO 2 , whereas conifer species with a high λ cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These studies indicate that angiosperms respond with a higher sensitivity in g s to elevated CO 2 than conifers. Our results suggest that differences in CO 2 response could result from the plant physiological cost of water loss, represented by the Lagrangian multiplier (λ) (Table S2) in the optimization procedure (15). According to the optimization hypothesis, angiosperm species with a low λ can resort to high values of g smax to function under low CO 2 , whereas conifer species with a high λ cannot.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…in which Γ (mol·mol −1 ) is the CO 2 compensation point in absence of dark respiration (15). The underlying assumption of this approach is that plants cannot transpire more water than they can transport from the soil, through their roots and stem up to their leaves (48).…”
Section: Model Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This has been especially problematic in attempts to use the change in D in leaf fossils, alone, as a proxy for change in global mean c a (Royer, 2014). A detailed theoretical framework for modeling the response of D to c a has been proposed that uses principles of leaf gas-exchange optimization (Konrad et al, 2008), but this awaits broader implementation and validation.…”
Section: Stomatal Size Density and Conductance Through Deep Timementioning
confidence: 99%