2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-9960(04)80121-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Sediment Compaction During Burial in Sedimentary Basins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A loss of porosity with depth could be expressed as an exponential decay process for different lithologies (Athy, ), which is easily incorporated into basin models (Giles et al ., ). The compaction curves vary considerably for different lithologies and compositions (Bjorlykke et al ., ). The sediment composition of each stratum and the compaction curves of each lithology are fundamentally important in accurately recovering the original sediment thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A loss of porosity with depth could be expressed as an exponential decay process for different lithologies (Athy, ), which is easily incorporated into basin models (Giles et al ., ). The compaction curves vary considerably for different lithologies and compositions (Bjorlykke et al ., ). The sediment composition of each stratum and the compaction curves of each lithology are fundamentally important in accurately recovering the original sediment thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results presented in this study are most relevant for the outer 20–30 km of the forearc, where compaction disequilibrium processes dominate and a constant lithology is most likely to occur. Beyond this distance from the deformation front, temperature, and pressure increase to levels where additional mechanical (e.g., grain crushing and fracturing), chemical (e.g., dissolution and precipitation of minerals), and diagenetic (e.g., smectite to illite transformation) processes become increasingly important over geological time (Bjørlykke et al., 2004; Saffer & Tobin, 2011). My observations imply that with small changes in stress as sediment enters the accretionary prism, significant fluid loss may occur due to compression as the sediment cannot hold those stresses and will lose porosity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more detail for the performed modelling steps, decompaction was performed by using well‐accepted initial porosity, compaction coefficient and sediment grain density parameters for typical lithological (sand, silt, clay) percentages (e.g. Bjørlykke et al., 2004; Mondol et al., 2007; Sclater & Christie, 1980) that were gathered through the available well‐log interpretation for each sequence (Table 3). The decompaction step removes the effect of burial compaction through time and displays the temporal variations in sequence thickness.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%