2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of roof geometries from low-resolution LiDAR data for city-scale solar energy applications using a neighbouring buildings method

Abstract: 6This article describes a method to model roof geometries from widely available low-resolution (2 m 7 horizontal) Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) datasets for application on a city wide scale. The 8 model provides roof area, orientation, and slope, appropriate for predictions of solar technology 9 performance, being of value to national and regional policy makers in addition to investors and 10 individuals appraising the viability of specific sites. Where present, similar buildings are grouped 11 together … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, very few outliers with significantly large differences (up to 6°) occur. The latter observation is also reported by other research groups (e.g., Gooding et al [35], Truong-Hong and Laefer [39]). The differences of the plane sizes are larger for all data types, approximately 12%-13% with the exception of the results for LiDAR at the test site Karlsruhe (18.4%) which affect the resulting energy yield significantly.…”
Section: Roof Plane Extractionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, very few outliers with significantly large differences (up to 6°) occur. The latter observation is also reported by other research groups (e.g., Gooding et al [35], Truong-Hong and Laefer [39]). The differences of the plane sizes are larger for all data types, approximately 12%-13% with the exception of the results for LiDAR at the test site Karlsruhe (18.4%) which affect the resulting energy yield significantly.…”
Section: Roof Plane Extractionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The results of usable solar radiation obtained from different input raster data mentioned above are then compared. Gooding et al [35] have created a model-driven approach especially for low point densities by grouping similar buildings together to increase the number of points on the roof structures. The quality evaluation delivers an identification rate of 87% and a mean absolute error of 3.76˝for roof slopes.…”
Section: Suitability Of Roof Planes For Resmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application may benefit from attributes such as the address and type of building for additional analyses [108], and it is being supported by an increasing number of software implementations [109,110]. Furthermore, some researchers use dense point clouds rather than semantic 3D city models (e.g., [111][112][113][114]). For a comprehensive overview of research on solar potential applications see the recent review of Freitas et al [115].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Solar Irradiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…on buildings), which may be performed on different sets of data, e.g. voxels (Hofierka and Zlocha 2012), lidar point clouds (Carneiro and Golay 2009, Jochem et al 2009, Yu et al 2009, Gooding et al 2015, and the ones with building data, e.g. derived with a combination of lidar and GIS data (Jakubiec and Reinhart 2013).…”
Section: General Overview Of the 3d Use Casementioning
confidence: 99%