Abstract:Studies of early physical interactions of ionizing radiation in biological medium have evolved from water cylinders or spheres to structured volumes representing nucleosomal DNA, based on spatial co-ordinates for each individual atom. Regarding the physico-chemical and chemical stages, the models of DNA have evolved from inactive geometrical objects to active participation of DNA in the reactions with the radical species. In this paper data are presented on the modelling of the interaction of low energy electr… Show more
“…Unexpectedly, this distance of 10 bp is exactly the value which has been frequently used for calculation (e.g. [7,42]). This value was also supported by ESR measurement [43], disintegration of 32 P atoms incorporated in λ phage DNA [44].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5][6][7]). We have studied the history of the Monte Carlo methods and applied them to a simpler system, an aqueous plasmid DNA solution.…”
We present a new Monte Carlo simulation code system (DBREAK) of the detailed events that occur when ionizing radiation interacts with water and DNA molecules. The model treats the initial energy deposition by radiation, the formation of chemically active species, subsequent diffusion-controlled chemical reactions, and induction of DNA strand breaks. DBREAK assumes one-hit single-strand break (SSB) and two-hit double-strand break (DSB) mechanisms. A high-resolution model of plasmid DNA structure has been introduced. The calculated results are compared with the results of previously performed experiments of the same type. Under aerobic conditions, 89.4% of the DNA damage was attributed to OH-radical and 10.5% and 0.1% to eaq- and H, respectively. We also compared the differences between liquid-water track structure and gas-phase-water track structure. The calculated yield of SSBs by liquid-water track structure exceeded that of gas-phase-water track structure by a factor of 1.2.
“…Unexpectedly, this distance of 10 bp is exactly the value which has been frequently used for calculation (e.g. [7,42]). This value was also supported by ESR measurement [43], disintegration of 32 P atoms incorporated in λ phage DNA [44].…”
Section: Comparison With Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5][6][7]). We have studied the history of the Monte Carlo methods and applied them to a simpler system, an aqueous plasmid DNA solution.…”
We present a new Monte Carlo simulation code system (DBREAK) of the detailed events that occur when ionizing radiation interacts with water and DNA molecules. The model treats the initial energy deposition by radiation, the formation of chemically active species, subsequent diffusion-controlled chemical reactions, and induction of DNA strand breaks. DBREAK assumes one-hit single-strand break (SSB) and two-hit double-strand break (DSB) mechanisms. A high-resolution model of plasmid DNA structure has been introduced. The calculated results are compared with the results of previously performed experiments of the same type. Under aerobic conditions, 89.4% of the DNA damage was attributed to OH-radical and 10.5% and 0.1% to eaq- and H, respectively. We also compared the differences between liquid-water track structure and gas-phase-water track structure. The calculated yield of SSBs by liquid-water track structure exceeded that of gas-phase-water track structure by a factor of 1.2.
“…Such a threshold energy deposition has been obtained from simulations of a very precise experimental data (Charlton and Humm, 1988;Nikjoo et al, 1996). Another method of converting energy deposition to strand breakage considers a physical event such as ionization (Terrissol, 1994). Our data base of frequencies of strand breakage by type and complexity are given for electrons, soft X-rays and ions (Nikjoo et al, , 2002.…”
“…This has come about through the availability of computer codes describing molecular interactions [1,2] along the tracks of ionising particles, availability of fast computers and models of DNA in simple and more sophisticated forms [3][4][5]. These descriptions have progressed from considerations of direct effects of radiation alone [6,7] to include the contributions of radical species (indirect effect) [3,8,9] in the environment of the cell nucleus, causing DNA damage in the form of single-strand breaks (ssb), double-strand breaks (dsb), base damage and complex combinations within the cluster of damage.…”
This paper presents data on modelling of DNA damage induced by electrons, protons and alpha-particles to provide an insight into factors which determine the biological effectiveness of radiations of high and low linear energy transfer (LET). These data include the yield of single- and double-strand breaks (ssb, dsb) and base damage in a cellular environment. We obtain a ratio of 4-15 for ssb:dsb for solid and cellular DNA and a preliminary ratio of about 2 for base damage to strand breakage. Data are also given on specific characteristics of damage at the DNA level in the form of clustered damage of varying complexity, that challenge the repair processes and if not processed adequately could lead to the observed biological effects. It is shown that nearly 30% of dsb are of complex form for low-LET radiation, solely by virtue of additional breaks, rising to about 70% for high-LET radiation. Inclusion of base damage increases the complex proportion to about 60% and 90% for low- and high-LET radiation, respectively. The data show a twofold increase in frequencies of complex dsb from low-LET radiation when base damage is taken into account. It is shown that most ssb induced by high-LET radiation have associated base damages, and also a substantial proportion is induced by low-energy electrons.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.