2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10457-007-9049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of planted legume fallows in Western Kenya using WaNuLCAS. (I) Model calibration and validation

Abstract: Poor soil fertility is the biggest obstacle to agricultural productivity in Sub-Saharan Africa. Improved fallows can help to raise agricultural productivity in these systems of low financial capital, however, experimental testing of their potential application domain and design is costly and time consuming. Models can evaluate alternative systems relatively quickly and at relatively low cost, but must first be validated to assess satisfactory simulation of the target systems. Specific climatic, edaphic, crop a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In accordance with previous studies [41,57,69,70], the range of the GOF statistics and the high correlation between the simulated and observed growth parameters for both the calibration (Figure 3) and the validation (Table 4) are indicative of the ability of the WaNuLCAS model to reproduce the early growth dynamics of the tested afforestation species with an acceptable accuracy and precision. A R 2 value of 0.5, CD value of 0.5-2, and EF value above 0.5 represent a good predicted-to-observed relationship [69].…”
Section: Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In accordance with previous studies [41,57,69,70], the range of the GOF statistics and the high correlation between the simulated and observed growth parameters for both the calibration (Figure 3) and the validation (Table 4) are indicative of the ability of the WaNuLCAS model to reproduce the early growth dynamics of the tested afforestation species with an acceptable accuracy and precision. A R 2 value of 0.5, CD value of 0.5-2, and EF value above 0.5 represent a good predicted-to-observed relationship [69].…”
Section: Model Performancesupporting
confidence: 62%
“…While dry-season leaf shed is characteristic for drought-deciduous tree species, its accounting in our simulations resulted in large reductions of the total height rather than D and AGB (results not shown), implying that tree canopy and height are more influenced by this process than D and AGB in the WaNuLCAS model. The lack of calibrated litterfall data may have caused the poor fit of the predicted D and AGB, albeit only during the dry season [57]. Despite these deviations between the observed and simulated values during the dry season, the well-reproduced growth patterns and accurate prediction of D, H, and AGB at the end of the growing seasons (Appendix A, Figure A2) are a sufficient basis for further analyses of plant growth.…”
Section: Model Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. The calculation of the initial pools followed the procedure described by Walker et al (2007) and was based on measured organic soil nitrogen and iteratively changing amounts of each pool until the best goodness of fit (GOF) of observed and simulated plant yields were achieved.…”
Section: Model Calibration and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WaNuLCAS has been used to predict mineral nitrogen leaching, the effect of nutrient limitation on tree and crop production and carbon sequestration under fallow systems in tropical ecosystems (Radersma et al 2005;Suprayogo et al 2002;Van Noordwijk and Cadisch 2002;Walker et al 2007Walker et al , 2008. To date, WaNuLCAS has not been widely used to predict erosion under various soil conservation measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%