2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of organ-specific radiation-induced secondary cancer risks following particle therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there is considerable reluctance to apply CIRT for pediatric patients primarily out of concern regarding treatment-related adverse events and second malignant neoplasms [ 29 , 30 ]. While preclinical and modelling studies have reported conflicting results [ 31 34 ], the out-of-field dose from secondary neutrons is lowest for carbon ions delivered by scanning beams followed by protons delivered by scanning beams, then passive beams. Secondary neutrons dose was highest for high-energy photons [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, there is considerable reluctance to apply CIRT for pediatric patients primarily out of concern regarding treatment-related adverse events and second malignant neoplasms [ 29 , 30 ]. While preclinical and modelling studies have reported conflicting results [ 31 34 ], the out-of-field dose from secondary neutrons is lowest for carbon ions delivered by scanning beams followed by protons delivered by scanning beams, then passive beams. Secondary neutrons dose was highest for high-energy photons [ 35 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the NTCP parameters for both the rectum and bladder have low n values (suggesting a low volume effect), the influence of the RBE models on the NTCP should be larger for prostate cancer patients than it would for tumor sites where, e.g., the lung (that has an n value close to 1) is the critical normal tissue; for the lung, the NTCP correlates with the mean dose and may therefore be less influenced by the differences between the constant and variable RBE w doses. In order to further investigate the uncertainties in the parameters, and their influence on the RBE w dose, one option would be to perform a model parameter scan to identify the influence of these variations [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the high uncertainty on the shape of the dose-response curve, it is hard to develop realistic mathematical models of radiation carcinogenesis. Comparative model studies of second cancer risk in patients exposed to C-ions and volumetric arc radiotherapy [ 312 ] or proton therapy [ 313 ] show only small predicted changes, that can change for different patients.…”
Section: Molecular Radiobiologymentioning
confidence: 99%