2019
DOI: 10.1177/0954406219892297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of material removal rate in the magnetic field and air-assisted electrical discharge machining

Abstract: In the present research work, an attempt has been made to develop the mathematical model to predict the material removal rate in the electrical discharge machining process when the assistance of air and magnetic field is provided together. The proposed model incorporates the physical phenomenon occurred during electrical discharge machining such as the plasma column expansion and reduction in the mean free path of electron in the plasma column due to magnetic field. In addition, the model incorporates the effe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This provided adequate time for the removal of debris from the machining zone. Hence, fewer recast layers were formed at a low duty cycle and as a result surface roughness decreased [33]. Further, from Figure 9(c) it can be seen that SR was found more in AAEDD in comparison to REDD.…”
Section: Influence Of Process Parameters On Srmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This provided adequate time for the removal of debris from the machining zone. Hence, fewer recast layers were formed at a low duty cycle and as a result surface roughness decreased [33]. Further, from Figure 9(c) it can be seen that SR was found more in AAEDD in comparison to REDD.…”
Section: Influence Of Process Parameters On Srmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The reaction is exothermic, which transfers heat to the discharge crater as seen by the chemical reaction (2Fe + 1.5O 2 → Fe 2 O 3 + heat) [33]. However, the multi-hole tool with slot facilitated the effective spreading of dielectric, as this speed up the removal of eroded maters from the spark zone.…”
Section: Effect Of Process Factors On Mrrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At moderate energy levels, the model exhibited an average error of 10% in predicting crater diameters and a 9% error in predicting depths for single spark discharges. Beravala and Pandey [98] formulated a mathematical model to predict the MRR in the context of EDM, considering the combined influences of air and magnetic fields. The developed mathematical model primarily accounted for three physical phenomena: the decrease in energy density resulting from plasma expansion, the increase in the MRR due to assistance from a liquid-gas medium, and the reduction in the electron mean free path due to the presence of a magnetic field.…”
Section: Materials Removal Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In theoretical and simulation studies, Heinz [7] analyzed the influence mechanism of magnetic field on plasma binding and plasma stability improvement when magnetic field acts on non-magnetic materials processed by fine EDM, and proved the mechanism of Lorentz force on material erosion. Beravala [8] used the air and magnetic field composite method to assist EDM to improve the material removal efficiency, and analyzed the effects of plasma expansion, electron free path reduction, and liquid-air mixing media in detail, and the results proved that the prediction model has high accuracy. Manesh [9] established a two-dimensional magnetic field-assisted EDM single-pulse material ablution model, and found that the Lorentz force under the magnetic field is conducive to the erosion of the material through the analysis of simulation and experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%