2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of fuel droplet heating and evaporation: Recent results and unsolved problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
141
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 282 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
1
141
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…biodiesel fuels), DCM approach (described in [2,10,13,17]) is easily implemented, where the number of components (up to 14 components) are relatively small. In the DCM analyses, we assume that droplets are spherically symmetric but temperature gradients and species diffusions in the liquid phase and the effect of internal recirculation due to relative velocity between ambient gas and droplets are all accounted for, using the Effective Thermal Conductivity and Effective Diffusivity (ETC/ED) models.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…biodiesel fuels), DCM approach (described in [2,10,13,17]) is easily implemented, where the number of components (up to 14 components) are relatively small. In the DCM analyses, we assume that droplets are spherically symmetric but temperature gradients and species diffusions in the liquid phase and the effect of internal recirculation due to relative velocity between ambient gas and droplets are all accounted for, using the Effective Thermal Conductivity and Effective Diffusivity (ETC/ED) models.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on recent research findings (e.g. [3,[10][11][12][13]), the drawbacks in modelling fuel droplets heating and evaporation processes (computationally expensive models, ignoring temperature gradient and transient species diffusion) are partially addressed using the MDQD model. This paper summarises some comparisons between the results, referring to fuel droplet evaporation times and time evolution of droplet surface temperatures and radii, predicted by the previously suggested simplified models, the recently developed version of the DCM and the multidimensional quasi-discrete model (MDQDM) [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The regularities of the droplet combustion of such fuels have been studied for a long time [7,8] and intensively [9]. However, interest in the combustion of liquid droplets is not reduced to the present time [10,11] due to the complex mechanisms of processes of heat and mass transfer and physicochemical transformations occurring in the drop, on its surface and in the near-surface (or adjacent) layer of the vapor-gas mixture. In particular, up to the present time, the temperature field of droplets is often assumed to be uniform when analyzing the conditions and characteristics of the combustion processes of condensed substances [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, up to the present time, the temperature field of droplets is often assumed to be uniform when analyzing the conditions and characteristics of the combustion processes of condensed substances [12]. The rate of vaporization of a flammable liquid is generally assumed to depend only on the intensity of the vapor mass transfer process in a thin layer of the external environment adjacent to the surface of the droplet [11]. At the same time the experimental data on the conditions and characteristics of the processes of ignition of fuel droplets and flammable liquids in the medium of high-temperature gases published relatively little.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation