2015
DOI: 10.1051/lhb/20150049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of fast hydraulic transients: issues, challenges, perspectives

Abstract: ABSTRACT. -The paper proposes an overview of different modelling approaches used for severe transients, particularly dam-break waves. One-, two-and three-dimensional approaches are briefly recalled with some examples in order to highlight their strengths and weaknesses, especially regarding the accurate speed of information through the numerical schemes. Two examples are developed with more details in order to highlight the result sensitivity to the selected model: the classical circular dam break and its depe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless of a model's complexity, all numerical models make approximations and thus present limitations that can easily lead to inaccurate predictions (Rowinśki & Radecki-Pawlik, 2015;Toombes & Chanson, 2011). The main problems presented in regard to hydraulic modelling of floods are (Liang & Borthwick, 2009;Néelz & Pender, 2010;Zech, et al, 2015): (1) the numerical instabilities present in high-resolution grids, (2) the computational time, (3) the modelling of the moving wet-dry interface, specifically the arrival time of the wave front in fluvial floods, (4) the maximum water depth and, finally (5) the representation of complex boundaries.…”
Section: Background 1521 Numerical Methods Used To Model Extreme Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regardless of a model's complexity, all numerical models make approximations and thus present limitations that can easily lead to inaccurate predictions (Rowinśki & Radecki-Pawlik, 2015;Toombes & Chanson, 2011). The main problems presented in regard to hydraulic modelling of floods are (Liang & Borthwick, 2009;Néelz & Pender, 2010;Zech, et al, 2015): (1) the numerical instabilities present in high-resolution grids, (2) the computational time, (3) the modelling of the moving wet-dry interface, specifically the arrival time of the wave front in fluvial floods, (4) the maximum water depth and, finally (5) the representation of complex boundaries.…”
Section: Background 1521 Numerical Methods Used To Model Extreme Evmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu and Cao, ; Hu et al ., ) as well as sharply stratified processes (e.g. Li et al ., ; Cao et al ., ; Zech et al , ).…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A wide range of fluvial processes have been investigated, including dam-break floods over erodible beds (Cao et al, 2004;Capart & Young, 1998;Huang et al, 2012Huang et al, , 2014Wu & Wang, 2007;Xia et al, 2010) and morphodynamic processes (Nicholas et al, 2013;Qian et al, 2017;Wang et al, 2008;Wu, 2007;Xie, 1990). In fact, as pointed out by Cao et al (2017), the SHSM equations have been extended to model coastal processes (Kim, 2015;Xiao et al, 2010;Zhu & Dodd, 2015), watershed erosion processes (Kim et al, 2013), subaqueous sediment-laden flows and turbidity currents (Hu & Cao, 2009;Hu et al, 2012), and sharply stratified processes (Li et al, 2013;Spinewine & Capart, 2013;Zech et al, 2015). Most recently, shallow water twophase models have been developed to better resolve fluvial processes (Cristo et al, 2015;Li et al, 2017) and debris flows (Li et al, 2018a(Li et al, , 2018b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%