1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(19990201)34:2<173::aid-prot3>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Factor Xa-inhibitor complexes: a computational flexible docking approach

Abstract: In order to understand the structural basis of Factor Xa (FXa) specificity, structural complexes of FXa with its synthetic inhibitors are determined using a computational docking approach. The AutoDock suite of programs is used to determine the binding modes of the synthetic inhibitors such as 3- and 4-amidinobenzylphenyl ether (ABP), amidinophenyl pyruvic acid (APPA), diamidinobenzofuranyl ethene (DABE), and DX-9065a 2-(5'-amidino-2'-benzofuranyl)-3-(7'amidino-2'-napthyl)-propionic acid (ABAP) to FXa. The syn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those values not only reproduce the experimental ranking of binding efficiencies but also are in the same range, the measured K i being 2.5⅐10 Ϫ5 Ϯ 0.5 M for acetylcholine, 0.55⅐10 Ϫ6 Ϯ 0.02 M for nicotine (42), and 1.9⅐10 Ϫ7 Ϯ 0.1 M for epibatidine (43). The binding free energy computed by AUTODOCK has been shown to reproduce correctly the experimental values (44). However, because of uncertainty on the comparative modeling process, absolute values have to be considered with caution at this stage.…”
Section: Model Of Chick ␣7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those values not only reproduce the experimental ranking of binding efficiencies but also are in the same range, the measured K i being 2.5⅐10 Ϫ5 Ϯ 0.5 M for acetylcholine, 0.55⅐10 Ϫ6 Ϯ 0.02 M for nicotine (42), and 1.9⅐10 Ϫ7 Ϯ 0.1 M for epibatidine (43). The binding free energy computed by AUTODOCK has been shown to reproduce correctly the experimental values (44). However, because of uncertainty on the comparative modeling process, absolute values have to be considered with caution at this stage.…”
Section: Model Of Chick ␣7mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AutoDock suite of programs, which was used for the docking calculation, employs an automated docking approach, allowing ligand flexibility as described to a full extent elsewhere (22). AutoDock has been compared with various other docking programs and has been found to be able to locate docking modes that are consistent with X-ray crystal structure (23)(24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Molecule Building and Nucleophilic Susceptibility Analysismentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The docking algorithm makes use of force field equations and parameters to calculate the binding energy between ligand and enzyme [19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. The binding free energy is the total of van der Waals interactions, H-bond interactions, electrostatic interactions and the internal static energy of the ligand as shown in Equation 1 [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33].…”
Section: Dockingmentioning
confidence: 99%