2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2009.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Escherichia coli O157:H7 growth at various storage temperatures on beef treated with electrolyzed oxidizing water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For statistical analysis, there was no significant difference in the sterilizing ability between LcEW and SAEW, although LcEW showed a little stronger germicidal efficacy than SAEW. Similar findings have been presented in another work from our laboratory, in which both LcEW and SAEW had similar antimicrobial effect on E. coli O157:H7 in beef (Ding et al, 2010). Also, various results related to the bactericidal activity of electrolyzed water have been reported from previous investigations.…”
Section: Disinfection Effect Of Lcew On Foodborne Pathogens Inoculatesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For statistical analysis, there was no significant difference in the sterilizing ability between LcEW and SAEW, although LcEW showed a little stronger germicidal efficacy than SAEW. Similar findings have been presented in another work from our laboratory, in which both LcEW and SAEW had similar antimicrobial effect on E. coli O157:H7 in beef (Ding et al, 2010). Also, various results related to the bactericidal activity of electrolyzed water have been reported from previous investigations.…”
Section: Disinfection Effect Of Lcew On Foodborne Pathogens Inoculatesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1 and 2 indicate that the germicidal efficacy of LcEW on naturally occurring microflora on the oyster mushroom was stronger than that of AO, 1% CA and NaOCl used in this study, while similar to SAEW. LcEW has been demonstrated to be a potential sanitizer by other publications (Ding et al, 2010). In addition, Koide, Takeda, Shi, Shono, and Atungulu (2009) reported that when fresh cut cabbage was washed by slightly acidic electrolyzed water (SLAEW, pH 6.1, 20 mg/L available chlorine), approximately 1.5 and 1.3 log CFU/g reductions were found in the total aerobic bacteria and in the yeasts and moulds counts, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In several previous studies, Gamma-concept models have been developed to determine the effect of different environmental factors on growth of pathogens (6,7). Temperature has been widely investigated as the most important environmental factor on the growth of the microorganisms (8,9). Numerous literatures have reported that the single and combined effects of temperature, pH, and water activity have been studied extensively on the growth and survival of E. coli O157:H7 in microbiological media and various foods (10,11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our newly developed low concentration electrolyzed water (LcEW) with a pH value of 6.2-6.5 (nearly neutral) which contains low concentration free chlorine (2-5 mg/L) is produced by electrolysis of a dilute NaCl solution (0.9%) in a chamber without a membrane. At a pH of 6.0-6.5, the effective form of chlorine compounds in LcEW is almost the hypochlorous acid (HOCl) having strong antimicrobial activity (Cao, Zhu, Shi, Wang, & Li, 2009;Ding, Rahman, Purev, & Oh, 2010;Yoshifumi, 2003). The application of LcEW may improve the bactericidal activity by maximizing the use of hypochlorous acid, reducing corrosion of surfaces, and minimizing human health and safety issues from Cl 2 off-gassing (Guentzel, Lam, Callan, Emmons, & Dunham, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%