Multiphase Flow 1995 1995
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-81811-9.50011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Dynamics of Aerosols in Near-Wall Turbulent Flows and Particle Deposition in Pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the combinations of friction for the wall and the free surface give the same tendency: height decreases with steam velocity. On top of that, the combination of the friction wall equation (17) with (19) and the interfacial friction equation (24) with (28) predicts, for all measured steam velocities, the height of the film within the experiment uncertainty of measurements. The model is thus capable of describing accurately the height of a highly sheared liquid film on a flat plate using the expression of Spedding and Hand for the wall friction (17) with (19) and with the expression of Ihnatowicz (24) for the friction at the free surface.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All the combinations of friction for the wall and the free surface give the same tendency: height decreases with steam velocity. On top of that, the combination of the friction wall equation (17) with (19) and the interfacial friction equation (24) with (28) predicts, for all measured steam velocities, the height of the film within the experiment uncertainty of measurements. The model is thus capable of describing accurately the height of a highly sheared liquid film on a flat plate using the expression of Spedding and Hand for the wall friction (17) with (19) and with the expression of Ihnatowicz (24) for the friction at the free surface.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…By setting a classical steam turbine wetness (up to 15%) and steam flow rate, a value of the mass term can be estimated. Another more precise approach consists in extracting the local droplet number and radius from the steam field resolved for a wet steam turbine [10], [14], and to translate these data into a deposition rate using Zaichik's correlation [28].…”
Section: Mass Termmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance the Zaichick correlation can be used for fog droplets deposition. For more details on this correlation, the reader can refer to Zaichik et al 18,19 Numerical schemes…”
Section: ðA2þmentioning
confidence: 99%