2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2007.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of dynamic ductile fracture and application to the simulation of plate impact tests on tantalum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
60
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(51 reference statements)
2
60
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the evolution of porosity and stress are not coupled, this model is able to describe only the early stage of damage. The work of Molinari and Wright (2005) has been extended by Wright and Ramesh (2008) and Czarnota et al (2008) in order to consider the nucleation and void growth up to finite porosity and to predict the macroscopic response of the material. The model proposed by Czarnota et al (2008) has been implemented in a finite element software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the evolution of porosity and stress are not coupled, this model is able to describe only the early stage of damage. The work of Molinari and Wright (2005) has been extended by Wright and Ramesh (2008) and Czarnota et al (2008) in order to consider the nucleation and void growth up to finite porosity and to predict the macroscopic response of the material. The model proposed by Czarnota et al (2008) has been implemented in a finite element software.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, this simple step, together with added viscosity s r , reduced the degree of sensitivity of numerical results due to computational cell size. Although not included in this model, inertial effects of pore growth 44 are also believed to be relevant for high density materials such as tantalum and also are expected to introduce additional regularization effects through the additional time rate sensitivity of pore growth.…”
Section: à4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] Moreover, a few modeling papers have suggested that the porosity achieved at the peak tensile stress is typically low (<1%), and the void coalescence is achieved long after the peak tensile stress. [63][64][65] Thus, it was proposed that the void coalescence behavior has no perceivable influence on the pull-back velocity and spall strength. [63][64][65] In the previous research, the influences for the strain hardening ability and the yield strength under quasi-static uniaxial stress conditions on the spall strength have been experimentally and numerically investigated.…”
Section: Effect Of the Microstructure On The Shock And Spall Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[63][64][65] In the previous research, the influences for the strain hardening ability and the yield strength under quasi-static uniaxial stress conditions on the spall strength have been experimentally and numerically investigated. 63,[65][66][67] Thus, the strain hardening ability and the yield strength under quasi-static uniaxial stress conditions, the HEL, and the spall strength have been plotted in Fig. 11 for the two microstructures.…”
Section: Effect Of the Microstructure On The Shock And Spall Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%