2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2009.07.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of combustion characteristics of high ash coal char particles at high pressure: Shrinking reactive core model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in Table 1 and Figures 1–3 are consistent with the shrinking core model (Chang and Kuo, 1999; Sadhukhan et al, 2010) for the production of activated carbon from petcoke. That is, the outer part of the particle was activated first and converted into an amorphous/porous structure, which allowed access for the reactants to the inner core.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results presented in Table 1 and Figures 1–3 are consistent with the shrinking core model (Chang and Kuo, 1999; Sadhukhan et al, 2010) for the production of activated carbon from petcoke. That is, the outer part of the particle was activated first and converted into an amorphous/porous structure, which allowed access for the reactants to the inner core.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although in many cases the shrinking core model was proven to approximate the results of the continuous models quite or reasonably well (Ishida and Wen, 1971;Do, 1982), non-negligible errors can result when it is not used properly (Melchiori and Canu, 2014). Several authors (Sadhukhan et al, 2010;Niksiar and Rahimi, 2009;Patisson and Ablitzer, 2002) agree that the accuracy of more detailed continuous models is needed to achieve a proper description of gas-solid reacting systems. Besides, the shrinking core model cannot properly account for several reacting shells that are expected with multistep reactions, although it has been applied to these cases also (Tsay et al, 1976).A shrinking-core model approach was followed by Abad et al (2011), to study the kinetics of the ilmenite-pseudobrookite system, for both oxidation and reduction steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the kinetic models commonly used in practice, such as the homogeneous model, the shrinking core model, the random pore model, the modified random pore model, and the modified volumetric model, are phenomenological models; of these, the homogeneous and unreacted shrinking core models are used most frequently. In the present paper, the homogeneous and unreacted shrinking core models were adopted to investigate the combustion reactivity of lignite microscopic structures [26].…”
Section: Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%