1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-4117(199802)15:1<16::aid-ppsc16>3.0.co;2-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of Binder-Induced Agglomeration

Abstract: From the analysis of pendular liquid bridge forces between spherical particles, a model has been developed to predict bridge rupture energies. Whilst this model has been shown to predict the correct trends in certain stages of agglomeration, it is limited by the assumptions of zero contact angle, toroidal bridge geometry, spherical particles and quasi-static rupture. The work described here is aimed at extending the model to more generally applicable conditions using direct measurement of bridge rupture energi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, t rup is proportional to the rupture energy (W rup ), and W rup increases with the liquid bridge volume, V (W rup ∼ V ) [30]. Concerning the present study, V increases with the layer thickness, causing an increase of W rup and a growth of t rup .…”
Section: Before Impactmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…To the best of our knowledge, t rup is proportional to the rupture energy (W rup ), and W rup increases with the liquid bridge volume, V (W rup ∼ V ) [30]. Concerning the present study, V increases with the layer thickness, causing an increase of W rup and a growth of t rup .…”
Section: Before Impactmentioning
confidence: 41%
“…FT = Fs + Fv (6) The total force, FT is measured experimentally, while the contributions from surface forces and viscous forces are Fs and Fv, respectively. When the liquid bridge elongates, so that D > b, then the force becomes: (7) similar to the relationships given by Fairbrother and Simons 25) and Pitois et al 23),24) . When the bridge is very short, with D < b, then Eq.…”
Section: Viscositymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Extensive studies on the outcome of a collision between wet solid surfaces, principally a binary collision of identical wet particles or a wet collision between a particle and a plate, (agglomeration or rebound) are reported in literature through either experiment [ [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] ] or modeling. One can classify the latter category in three groups on the basis of adopted assumptions: (i) some assumed that collision behavior is dominated by capillary effects [ 6 , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] ]; (ii) some postulated that viscous effects are dominant [ [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [26] ]; and (iii) others considered that both the capillary and viscous effects simultaneously govern the collision behavior [ 2 , [27] , [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] ]. The proposed models in most of these studies, except the one proposed by Balakin et al [ 29 ], are for a binary collision of identical wet particles or a wet collision between a particle and a plate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%