2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2005.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of a rotary kiln for the pyrolysis of aluminium waste

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If it is considered that the coal used for the process being modeled behaves in the same way as the subbituminous coal used by Nelson, which produces a char the same as the one shown in Figure 2 named ''char G,'' giving a g value of 0.65. The inclusion of NOx modeling to predict the pollutant behavior in co-combustion processes for rotary kilns represents an important improvement when compared to previous numerical models of similar systems, such as the models developed by Mastorakos et al (1999), Martins et al (2001), and Marias et al (2005) for rotary kilns and Fidaros et al (2007) for a calciner. According to the specific characteristics of the processes modeled by these authors, the use of gas phase conservation equations, chemical-turbulence interaction models, and kinetic= diffusion solid fuel reaction mechanisms can be found; however, none of them evaluates the pollutant formation of NOx formation for any of the three different mechanisms considered in this research.…”
Section: Coal and Natural Gas Co-combustion In Rotary Kiln 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is considered that the coal used for the process being modeled behaves in the same way as the subbituminous coal used by Nelson, which produces a char the same as the one shown in Figure 2 named ''char G,'' giving a g value of 0.65. The inclusion of NOx modeling to predict the pollutant behavior in co-combustion processes for rotary kilns represents an important improvement when compared to previous numerical models of similar systems, such as the models developed by Mastorakos et al (1999), Martins et al (2001), and Marias et al (2005) for rotary kilns and Fidaros et al (2007) for a calciner. According to the specific characteristics of the processes modeled by these authors, the use of gas phase conservation equations, chemical-turbulence interaction models, and kinetic= diffusion solid fuel reaction mechanisms can be found; however, none of them evaluates the pollutant formation of NOx formation for any of the three different mechanisms considered in this research.…”
Section: Coal and Natural Gas Co-combustion In Rotary Kiln 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport of material through the rotary kiln is specified by equation (6), which is commonly known as Kramers equation [5].…”
Section: Modeling Of the Bed Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a widely accepted tool for the detailed description of gaseous combustion phenomena occurring within a rotary kiln [6], [3]. Unfortunately, it does neither allow for the modeling of transport of the solid bed nor for the theoretical description of the chemical reactions therein.…”
Section: Comparison To Cfd Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are a key element in the production processes of cement (Mujumdar and Ranade, 2006), lime and pigments (titanium dioxide calcination) and in extractive metallurgy for the reduction of ore (Boateng, 2008). Rotary kilns are well suited for the conversion of coal and coke (Lebas et al, 1995), for drying (Shahhosseini et al, 2000), for the pyrolysis of solid waste (Descoins et al, 2005;Marias et al, 2005), and are also used for several conversions in the manufacture of nuclear fuel (Debacq, 2001;Thammavong et al, 2011). Rotary kilns used for the conversion of enriched or depleted uranium are equipped with lifters and are externally and electrically heated, but they differ in size and nominal operating conditions, as can be seen in Table 1: the type of rotary kiln used for depleted uranium conversion is henceforth named "kiln #1"; the type of conversion kiln used for enriched uranium is named "kiln #2".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%