2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2020.115801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modelling of a pressure swing adsorption unit by deep learning and artificial Intelligence tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, this procedure will be used with the NOE and NARX structures to determine the best number of input and output delays to be used in each predictor. The value p = 0.01 N was chosen following the literature recommendation [18]. Figure 5 presents the results obtained after applying the Lipschitz analysis on the synthetic data obtained from the virtual plant.…”
Section: Embedding Dimensions Optimal Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, this procedure will be used with the NOE and NARX structures to determine the best number of input and output delays to be used in each predictor. The value p = 0.01 N was chosen following the literature recommendation [18]. Figure 5 presents the results obtained after applying the Lipschitz analysis on the synthetic data obtained from the virtual plant.…”
Section: Embedding Dimensions Optimal Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it presents the identification of machine learning (ML) models to simulate the dynamic behavior PSA unit. The machine learning strategies employed here were the traditional feedforward neural network (FNN), a recurrent neural network (RNN), and a deep neural network (DNN) [18]. Therefore, three main contributions of this work are highlighted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some optimization methods have been used in PSA, such as sequential quadratic programming and the single discretization method; however, these methods are complex and require time-consuming calculations [26,27]. Multiple artificial intelligence models have been applied to predict the performance of PSA cycles, and research results show that the deep learning model has the best predictive effect [28]. Dual-and tri-objective optimizations were applied to a four-bed, eight-step PSA model to produce hydrogen from an SMR gas mixture [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pai et al 15 extended the use of feed-forward ANN models to predict the axial profiles of the intensive variables for a four-step VSA process at CSS, and the models were experimentally validated. Furthermore, Oliveira et al 16 developed a real-time soft sensor for a PSA unit based on neural network models. Three types of ANN architectures, namely, feed-forward, recurrent, and long short-term memory (LSTM) based on multi-input and a single output, are used to predict the PSA process performance over the number of cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%